Biofunctional prosthetic system in prosthodontics – a systematic review

Khazi, Shakeel Santerbennur; Shetty, Shishir Ram; Reddy, Sesha; Shetty, Raghavendra; Vannala, Venkataramana; Philip, Shaju; Atef, Ahmed

doi:10.5114/jos.2019.93847

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even though there have been advancements in the manufacturing of full dentures and procedures, the number of patients who use removable dentures has increased. The biofunctional prosthetic system, which focuses on bilateral balanced articulation and is the most sophisticated approach utilized today [ 76 ], is the method that is currently used. Because of its capacity to manufacture dentures that really resemble the natural parts they substitute while also satisfying the cosmetic, functional, and phonetic needs of the patient, the biofunctional prosthetic system (BPS) is also known as the “biogenic” or “biofunctional” prosthetic system [ 77 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Contemporary Review of Clinical Factors Involved in Speech-Perspectives from a Prosthodontist Point of View

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: Learning to speak properly requires a fully formed brain, good eyesight, and a functioning auditory system. Defective phonation is the outcome of a failure in the development of any of the systems or components involved in speech production. Dentures with strong phonetic skills can be fabricated with the help of a dentist who has a firm grasp of speech production and phonetic characteristics. Every dentist strives to perfect their craft by perfecting the balance between the technical, cosmetic, and acoustic aspects of dentistry, or “phonetics”. The ideal prosthesis for a patient is one that not only sounds good but also functions well mechanically and aesthetically. Words are spoken by using articulators that alter their size and form. Conclusions: Therefore, a prosthesis should be made in such a way that it does not interfere with the ability to communicate. As a result, a prosthodontist has to have a solid grasp of how speech is made and the numerous parts that go into it.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Contemporary Review of Clinical Factors Involved in Speech-Perspectives from a Prosthodontist Point of View

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Matsuda et al [ 18 ] reported no differences in patient satisfaction and denture adjustments between BPS and CCD. However, Khazi et al [ 19 ] stated that a large number of clinical trials are still required to establish the superiority of BPS over conventional dentures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction of Injection-Molded Conventional Complete Dentures and Biofunctional Prosthetic System Dentures: A Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial

Vivek¹,

Jagdish²,

Murugesan³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionComplete loss of natural teeth severely compromises the masticatory efficiency of geriatric patients and directly affects their general health. Biofunctional prosthetic system (BPS) has been developed as an alternate method of denture fabrication to match the higher expectations of patients. Studies comparing BPS dentures with injection-molded conventional complete dentures (IM-CCD) are lacking. Our study aimed to compare the masticatory efficiency and patient satisfaction of BPS dentures with IM-CCD. MethodsThis trial was designed as a randomized, prospective, single-center, double-blinded study with two parallel arms (BPS group and IM-CCD group) having an equal allocation (1:1). Completely edentulous patients aged 45-80 who visited our outpatient department between January and August 2018 were screened and enrolled according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Random sequence generation was done using an online randomization program. Allocation concealment was done using sequentially labeled opaque envelopes. The participants and the outcome assessors were blinded. A single operator performed all the clinical procedures in both groups under the guidance of the instructor. The age and gender of the patients were recorded for demographic data at baseline. Primary outcomes were assessed six weeks after denture insertion. The number of denture adjustments required during the first six weeks after denture delivery was recorded as the secondary outcome. Masticatory efficiency was evaluated by the volumetric single-sieve method. An abbreviated version of the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire for edentulous patients (OHIP-EDENT) was used for patient satisfaction scores. The total OHIP-EDENT score was calculated by adding all the responses to the 19 questions (ranging from 0 to 38). Individual domain scores were calculated by adding the response to all the questions in that domain. All the data obtained were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data were analyzed using either unpaired Student's T-test or Mann-Whitney U test for normal and non-normal data, respectively. The gender characteristics of the sample were compared using Chi-Square test.

show abstract

Biofunctional prosthetic system in prosthodontics – a systematic review

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

A Contemporary Review of Clinical Factors Involved in Speech-Perspectives from a Prosthodontist Point of View

A Contemporary Review of Clinical Factors Involved in Speech-Perspectives from a Prosthodontist Point of View

Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction of Injection-Molded Conventional Complete Dentures and Biofunctional Prosthetic System Dentures: A Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About