Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofouling development and its effect on growth and reproduction of the farmed pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous work has shown that the proportion of females has decreased for cultured pearl oysters compared with the natural stocks (Thielley, ). In addition, Lacoste et al () observed a negative effect of monthly cleaning on female sex on farmed pearl oysters reared in a lagoon. It therefore appeared important to find non‐stressful cleaning methods in order to consider only the effect of the environmental factors and promote females in aquaculture rearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous work has shown that the proportion of females has decreased for cultured pearl oysters compared with the natural stocks (Thielley, ). In addition, Lacoste et al () observed a negative effect of monthly cleaning on female sex on farmed pearl oysters reared in a lagoon. It therefore appeared important to find non‐stressful cleaning methods in order to consider only the effect of the environmental factors and promote females in aquaculture rearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This absence of gametes in those individuals could be due to (i) spawning occurring a few days prior to the biopsy, but since spawning is mostly triggered by environmental conditions, it should also have affected natural populations, or (ii) an interruption of gametogenesis, because of stress caused by aquaculture practices (suspension on moving culture ropes in the water column, regular epibiont cleaning, etc.) [9] or other unknown disturbances (food depletion, etc.). The stress hypothesis is more likely, as stress was previously reported to affect gametogenesis in pearl oysters [9,10].…”
Section: Demographic and Genetic Analysis Of The Exploited Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] or other unknown disturbances (food depletion, etc.). The stress hypothesis is more likely, as stress was previously reported to affect gametogenesis in pearl oysters [9,10].…”
Section: Demographic and Genetic Analysis Of The Exploited Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thieltges and Buschbaum (2007) also showed that epibiotic Crepidula fornicata reduces the growth and survival of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). Recently, Lacoste et al (2014) recorded that biofouling reduces the growth of pearl oysters (Pinctada margaritifera) in French Polynesia. Our results showed that non-fouled females of S. haeamstoma have heavier shells and flesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%