Biofilm and Dental Biomaterials

Øilo, Marit; Bakken, Vidar

doi:10.3390/ma8062887

Cited by 77 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies have assessed the role of biomaterials in the regulation of the oral microbiota [58]. As stated by Antonelli et al [59], the simplest surfaces for bacteria to colonize are hard ones as mucous membranes tend to scale off and, therefore, do not guarantee a stable adhesion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The only exception to this is the tongue, which is highly colonized even if it is a mucosal surface because of the irregular surfaces of papillae [60]. Consequently, the introduction of a biomaterial into this open system creates a further retentive surface on which bacterial species are able to reproduce and where there is an increased difficulty in maintaining oral hygiene [58]. As revealed by the Øilo and Bakken [58] literature review, the presence of biomaterials results in an increase in plaque and alterations in the oral microbiota.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review

Lucchese

Bondemark

Marcolina

et al. 2018

Journal of Oral Microbiology

131

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Oral microbiota has been at the center of cultural attention in recent years. In daily clinical practice, orthodontic appliances may be associated with an increased cariogenic risk and a worsening of preexisting periodontal diseases.Objective: The purpose of this review is to investigate the available evidence regarding the association between orthodontic appliances and changes in the quality and quantity of the oral microbiota.Design: The research included every article published up to October 2017 featuring the keywords ‘Orthodontic appliance* AND (microbiological colonization OR periodontal pathogen* OR Streptococcus mutans OR Lactobacillus spp. OR Candida OR Tannerella forsythia OR Treponema denticola OR Fusobacterium nucleatum OR Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans OR Prevotella intermedia OR Prevotella nigrescens OR Porphyromonas gingivalis)’ and was conducted in the major medical databases. The methodological quality of selected papers was scored using the ‘Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care Criteria for Grading Assessed Studies’ (SBU) method.Results: Orthodontic appliances influence the oral microbiota with an increase in the counts of S. mutans and Lactobacillus spp. and in the percentage of potentially pathogenic gram-negative bacteria.Conclusions: There is moderate/high evidence regarding the association between orthodontic appliances and changes in the oral microbiota.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018091589.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review

Lucchese

Bondemark

Marcolina

et al. 2018

Journal of Oral Microbiology

131

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All bracket samples were below a threshold value of Ra = 0.2 µm, where the formation of biofilm is not substantially influenced by the surface roughness [8, 52, 62]. The differences in biofilm formation can therefore be attributed solely to the type of layer.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of intraoral biofilm reduction on silver-coated and silver ion-implanted stainless steel bracket material

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe objective of this in situ study was to quantify the intraoral biofilm reduction on bracket material as a result of different surface modifications using silver ions. In addition to galvanic silver coating and physical vapor deposition (PVD), the plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition (PIIID) procedure was investigated for the first time within an orthodontic application.Materials and methodsAn occlusal splint equipped with differently silver-modified test specimens based on stainless steel bracket material was prepared for a total of 12 periodontally healthy patients and was worn in the mouth for 48 h. The initially formed biofilm was fluorescently stained and a quantitative comparative analysis of biofilm volume, biofilm surface coverage and live/dead distribution of bacteria was performed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).ResultsCompared to untreated stainless steel bracket material, the antibacterial effect of the PIIID silver-modified surface was just as significant with regard to reducing the biofilm volume and the surface coverage as the galvanically applied silver layer and the PVD silver coating. Regarding the live/dead distribution, however, the PIIID modification was the only surface that showed a significant increase in the proportion of dead cells compared to untreated bracket material and the galvanic coating.ConclusionsOrthodontic stainless steel with a silver-modified surface by PIIID procedure showed an effective reduction in the intraoral biofilm formation compared to untreated bracket material, in a similar manner to PVD and galvanic silver coatings applied to the surface. Additionally, the PIIID silver-modified surface has an increased bactericidal effect.

show abstract

“…Biofilms are found in healthy individuals and are usually harmless, consisting of predominantly commensal bacteria. However, if they are allowed to accumulate, the composition may change, allowing pathogens to become more prevalent (Øilo & Bakken, ). Depending on the location, caries, gingivitis, and subsequently periodontitis or peri‐implantitis may occur.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, if they are allowed to accumulate, the composition may change, allowing pathogens to become more prevalent (Øilo & Bakken, 2015). Depending on the location, caries, gingivitis, and subsequently periodontitis or peri-implantitis may occur.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Biofilm formation on polyetheretherketone and titanium surfaces

Barkarmo

Longhorn

Leer

et al. 2019

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer used in devices in orthopedic and dental rehabilitation. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare biofilm formation by a range of important oral bacterial species on PEEK, blasted PEEK, commercially pure titanium (cp‐Ti), and titanium‐6 aluminium‐4 vanadium (Ti6Al4V). Material and methods Coin‐shaped samples were manufactured, and the surfaces were characterized using optical interferometry, scanning electron microscopy, energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy, and contact angle measurements. Bacterial species of Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus oralis, Enterococcus faecalis , and Streptococcus gordonii were cultured on the four material surfaces for varying amounts of time. Biofilms were quantified following staining with crystal violet. Results Roughness and contact angle results showed blasted PEEK > PEEK > cp‐Ti = Ti6Al4V. There was increased biofilm formation on blasted PEEK by S. sanguinis, S. oralis , and S. gordonii , whereas the bacterial adhesion was similar on PEEK, cp‐Ti, and Ti6Al4V. The bacterial growth of E. faecalis was significantly higher on cp‐Ti compared with the other three groups. Conclusion The results, taking into consideration the biofilm formation, suggest that PEEK should perform as well as cp‐Ti or TiAl6V4 when used as a dental restorative material.

show abstract

Biofilm and Dental Biomaterials

Cited by 77 publications

References 65 publications

Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review

Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review

Comparison of intraoral biofilm reduction on silver-coated and silver ion-implanted stainless steel bracket material

Biofilm formation on polyetheretherketone and titanium surfaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About