2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00058-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
120
1
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
120
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, the benefit-cost ratio from garlic production in the farms was calculated to be 1.36. These results are consistent with the findings reported by other authors, such as 1.83 and 2.21 for greenhouse and open-field grape (Ozkan et al, 2007) and 1.10 for soybean, 2.03 for wheat, 1.98 for mustard and 2.30 for chickpea (Mandal et al, 2002), 2.58 and 1.88 for cucumber and potato, respectively (Mohammadi et al, 2008, Mohammadi andOmid, 2010 ) by total production costs (6969.11 $ ha -1 ). Table 6 shows the rate of MD in percent in each of machinery operations in garlic cultivation in different levels, separately.…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of Garlic Productionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Based on these results, the benefit-cost ratio from garlic production in the farms was calculated to be 1.36. These results are consistent with the findings reported by other authors, such as 1.83 and 2.21 for greenhouse and open-field grape (Ozkan et al, 2007) and 1.10 for soybean, 2.03 for wheat, 1.98 for mustard and 2.30 for chickpea (Mandal et al, 2002), 2.58 and 1.88 for cucumber and potato, respectively (Mohammadi et al, 2008, Mohammadi andOmid, 2010 ) by total production costs (6969.11 $ ha -1 ). Table 6 shows the rate of MD in percent in each of machinery operations in garlic cultivation in different levels, separately.…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of Garlic Productionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Energy use efficiency (energy ratio), energy productivity, water productivity, specific energy (Khan, Singh 1996;Mandal et al 2002;Khan et al 2004;Yilmaz et al 2005), and net energy were calculated, as they are shown in Eqs 1-5 (Singh et al 1997;Mandal et al 2002;Mohammadi, Omid 2010). …”
Section: Energy Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when ploughing, applying fertilizers and pesticides, planting, watering, crop cultivation, harvesting, food processing, and transport (Chauhan et al, 2005;Mandal et al, 2002 , 2004). Ancient subsistence rice cultivation practices involved low energy inputs through scattering of seed resulting in meagre yields.…”
Section: Energy and Rice Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when ploughing, applying fertilizers and pesticides, planting, watering, crop cultivation, harvesting, food processing, and transport (Chauhan et al, 2005;Mandal et al, 2002). Energy consumption in agriculture is directly related to the development of technology and the level of production from a system (Hatirli et al, 2006; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 5 al., 2004).…”
Section: Energy and Rice Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation