2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00947-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioelectrical impedance vector distribution in the first year of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
28
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioresistance correlates negatively with lean body mass measurements obtained by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and deuterium oxide dilution methodologies in adults, children, and neonates (25)(26)(27). Normal values for bioresistance are available in Italian infants (28), but values for Hispanic neonates have not been reported. All measurements were made by one investigator (J.S.D.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bioresistance correlates negatively with lean body mass measurements obtained by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and deuterium oxide dilution methodologies in adults, children, and neonates (25)(26)(27). Normal values for bioresistance are available in Italian infants (28), but values for Hispanic neonates have not been reported. All measurements were made by one investigator (J.S.D.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accuracy of the prediction equations depends on numerous assumptions, including constant tissue hydration and homogenous conduction of the electrical current through a cylindrical body. The former assumption is poorly upheld in infancy; as mentioned above, body water compartments and the FFM hydration are undergoing rapid changes during infancy here that affect fluid distribution and electrolyte concentrations between the intra- and extracellular compartments, making estimates of body composition obtained from BIA imprecise for the first few years of life (Margutti et al, 2010; Savino et al, 2003). For these and other reasons, BIA body composition equations tend to have poor performance across different ethnic groups and populations (Dehghan and Merchant, 2008), including in infants (Tanabe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (Bia)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIVA uses R and X c values (both adjusted for length) directly from the instrument (Piccoli et al, 1994), without reliance on any assumptions about their relationship to FFM. BIVA reference data are available for both neonates and older infants (Barbosa-Silva et al, 2005; L’Abee et al, 2010; Margutti et al, 2010; Savino et al, 2003). Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS), in which over 250 different frequencies are used, has also been examined in infants to distinguish between intracellular and extracellular water; interobserver error in extracellular and intracellular resistance measures (Re and Ri, respectively) is very good to excellent (ICC =0.97 for Re and 0.72 for Ri), as is intra-observer error (ICC for Re =0.97–0.99; ICC for Ri =0.61–0.85) in infants 0 to 6 months (Sesmero et al, 2005).…”
Section: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (Bia)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the variability of estimates obtained with the best BIA regression equations is unacceptable for clinical purposes, particularly in infants. On the other hand, BIA values presented as direct data without using the equations recently published [22][23][24]37] have proved to be very useful to evaluate hydration status variations in childhood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%