Bioelectrical impedance analysis for the prediction of fat-free mass in buffalo calf

Sarubbi, Fiorella; Baculo, Rodolfo; Balzarano, D.

doi:10.1017/s1751731108002644

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Higbie et al (2002) estimated total lean and total fat weight in pork carcasses by measuring total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) of pig carcass. Sarubbi et al (2008) predicted the fat‐free mass (FFM) of buffalo calf based on bioimpedance. Chanet et al (1999) assessed moisture and lipid content of potted minced pork based on bioimpedance for the control of the production process of canned meat.…”

Section: Application Of Bioimpedance In Meat Quality Inspectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review: Application and research progress of bioimpedance in meat quality inspection

Zhang

Tian

et al. 2022

J Food Process Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioimpedance is an effective analytical technique for electrochemical system, which has the advantages of rapid, nondestructive, inexpensive, and easy to implement, and has shown a wide application for food quality and safety assessment recently. The main objectives of this review are to review recent progress in the application of bioimpedance in the detection of various meat quality attributes, and conduct a classification review in accordance with detection indicators of meat products, including carcass composition (IMF, fat, water, etc.) and physicochemical properties (TVB‐N, pH, shear force, etc.). In addition, we describe the basic principle of bioimpedance and factors affecting the measurement of impedance. Finally, we discussed the challenges of bioimpedance technology applied to meat quality inspection. The measurement device should be further optimized to reduce the effects of electrode polarization and muscle anisotropy, while more effective equivalent circuit models and data processing methods should be investigated. And the integration of other technologies and the development of certain bio‐detection devices, as well as the point‐of‐need diagnostic devices, are expected to be future trends in impedance technology.

show abstract

Section: Application Of Bioimpedance In Meat Quality Inspectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review: Application and research progress of bioimpedance in meat quality inspection

Zhang

Tian

et al. 2022

J Food Process Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besides, differently from traditional methods, BIA does not require the sacrifice of animals to evaluate tissue composition and energetic level unless dissection is performed when applicable (7) . The principles of BIA have been applied and adapted for animal production to determine the tissue composition of swine (8) , bovines (9) , ovine (10,11) , bubalus (12) carcasses as well as to evaluate the composition of raw cow milk (2) .…”

Section: Electric Bioimpedancementioning

confidence: 99%

Análisis de impedancia bioeléctrica (AIB) en la producción animal. Revisión

Schumacher

Viégas

Cardoso

et al. 2021

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a method based on the different levels of opposition to the flow of an ionic current through the different body tissues. Results are expressed by primary measures of resistance (Rs) and reactance (Xs). From such measures, equations are applied to determine the phase angle (PA) and impedance (Z). Bioimpedance analysis has been indicated as a reliable and precise method to determine the body composition and nutritional status in humans. BIA has recently been adapted to be applied on animal production. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an analysis on the potential use of bioelectrical impedance on zootechnical production. Through BIA, correlations among bioelectrical measures and tissue composition of swine, bovine, ovine, bubaline and fish carcasses can be established. In this regard, a growing number of demands were led by more precise and cost-effective methods to evaluate the body composition in the zootechnical sector, in which the analysis of bioelectrical impedance proved to be a promising and minimally invasive technology to replace traditional methods.

show abstract

“…Several techniques have been reported as valuable tools for estimation of carcass composition for pig, sheep and cattle, but little information has been reported for kid carcass composition. One of these techniques is bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), which has provided good predictions of leaness for pig (Swantek et al, 1992 andMarchello et al, 1999a;Daza et al, 2006), sheep (Jenkins et al, 1988;Berg and Marchello, 1994;Berg et al, 1996), cattle (Marchello and Slanger, 1992;Velazco et al, 1999;Marchello et al, 1999b) and buffalo (Sarubbi et al, 2008). Other techniques such as computer tomography (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of bioelectrical impedance analysis in prediction of light kid carcass and muscle chemical composition

Silva

Afonso²,

Monteiro

et al. 2018

Animal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carcass data were collected from 24 kids (average live weight of 12.5±5.5 kg; range 4.5 to 22.4 kg) of Jarmelista Portuguese native breed, to evaluate bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a technique for prediction of light kid carcass and muscle chemical composition. Resistance (Rs, Ω) and reactance (Xc, Ω), were measured in the cold carcasses with a single frequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer and, together with impedance (Z, Ω), two electrical volume measurements (VolA and VolB, cm2/Ω), carcass cold weight (CCW), carcass compactness and several carcass linear measurements were fitted as independent variables to predict carcass composition by stepwise regression analysis. The amount of variation explained by VolA and VolB only reached a significant level (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively) for muscle weight, moisture, protein and fat-free soft tissue content, even so with low accuracy, with VolA providing the best results (0.326⩽R 2⩽0.366). Quite differently, individual BIA parameters (Rs, Xc and Z) explained a very large amount of variation in dissectible carcass fat weight (0.814⩽R 2⩽0.862; P<0.01). These individual BIA parameters also explained a large amount of variation in subcutaneous and intermuscular fat weights (respectively 0.749⩽R 2⩽0.793 and 0.718⩽R 2⩽0.760; P<0.01), and in muscle chemical fat weight (0.663⩽R 2⩽0.684; P<0.01). Still significant but much lower was the variation in muscle, moisture, protein and fat-free soft tissue weights (0.344⩽R 2⩽0.393; P<0.01) explained by BIA parameters. Still, the best models for estimation of muscle, moisture, protein and fat-free soft tissue weights included Rs in addition to CCW, and accounted for 97.1% to 99.8% (P<0.01) of the variation observed, with CCW by itself accounting for 97.0% to 99.6% (P<0.01) of that variation. Resistance was the only independent variable selected for the best model predicting subcutaneous fat weight. It was also selected for the best models predicting carcass fat weight (combined with carcass length, CL; R 2=0.943; P<0.01) and intermuscular fat weight (combined with CCW; R 2=0.945; P<0.01). The best model predicting muscle chemical fat weight combined CCW and Z, explaining 85.6% (P<0.01) of the variation observed. These results indicate BIA as a useful tool for prediction of light kids' carcass composition.

show abstract

Bioelectrical impedance analysis for the prediction of fat-free mass in buffalo calf

Cited by 9 publications

References 25 publications

A review: Application and research progress of bioimpedance in meat quality inspection

A review: Application and research progress of bioimpedance in meat quality inspection

Análisis de impedancia bioeléctrica (AIB) en la producción animal. Revisión

Application of bioelectrical impedance analysis in prediction of light kid carcass and muscle chemical composition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About