Biodiversity conservation in agriculture requires a multi-scale approach

Abstract

Biodiversity loss-one of the most prominent forms of modern environmental change-has been heavily driven by terrestrial habitat loss and, in particular, the spread and intensification of agriculture. Expanding agricultural land-use has led to the search for strong conservation strategies, with some suggesting that biodiversity conservation in agriculture is best maximized by reducing local management intensity, such as fertilizer and pesticide application. Others highlight the importance of landscape-level approaches that incorporate natural or semi-natural areas in landscapes surrounding farms. Here, we show that both of these practices are valuable to the conservation of biodiversity, and that either local or landscape factors can be most crucial to conservation planning depending on which types of organisms one wishes to save. We performed a quantitative review of 266 observations taken from 31 studies that compared the impacts of localized (within farm) management strategies and landscape complexity (around farms) on the richness and abundance of plant, invertebrate and vertebrate species in agro-ecosystems. While both factors significantly impacted species richness, the richness of sessile plants increased with less-intensive local management, but did not significantly respond to landscape complexity. By contrast, the richness of mobile vertebrates increased with landscape complexity, but did not significantly increase with less-intensive local management. Invertebrate richness and abundance responded to both factors. Our analyses point to clear differences in how various groups of organisms respond to differing scales of management, and suggest that preservation of multiple taxonomic groups will require multiple scales of conservation.

Identifying the landscape drivers of agricultural insecticide use leveraging evidence from 100,000 fields

“…Aggregate food production from intensification has undoubtedly increased, reducing the pressure of agricultural land expansion into natural habitats to meet the growing food demand (7). However, there are numerous unintended consequences of agricultural intensification for biodiversity (8)(9)(10), water quality, and other ecosystem services (5,11).…”

Local and Landscape Correlates of Spider Activity Density and Species Richness in Urban Gardens

“…Interactions between local and landscape conservation strategies are important but can affect different taxonomic groups in different ways, implying that other mechanisms such as dispersal ability, range size, or response to disturbance are also important , Batáry et al 2012, Gonthier et al 2014. Both local and landscape factors may also have significant effects on biological control in agricultural areas (Schmidt et al 2004).…”

Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity

“…fire, feral horses, climate change) threaten biodiversity values. It is also in line with ecological critiques that biodiversity institutions are too focused on protecting endangered species, and better biodiversity outcomes could be achieved by adopting larger--scaled approaches (Pasari et al 2013;Gonthier et al 2014). • Program is currently in a lull and collaborative activities are still 'add--ons' to core activities of agency managers.…”