2020
DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1787558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodistribution of etoposide via intratumoral chemotherapy with etoposide-loaded implants

Abstract: Etoposide (VP16) is the traditional antitumor agent which has been widely used in a variety of cancers. However, intravenous administration of VP16 was limited in clinical application because of its low aqueous solubility, poor bioavailability and dose-limiting adverse effects. Local chemotherapy with VP16-loaded drug delivery systems could provide a continuous release of drug at the target site, while minimizing the systemic toxicity. In this study, we prepared the poly- l -lactic acid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bionic vascular scaffold prolonged the capture time by at least six months, mainly dependent on the degradable material type (PLLA for this work). [ 25 ] The capture efficiency of HA‐MVS increased in a time‐dependent manner, with 92% of the captured cells eliminated in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bionic vascular scaffold prolonged the capture time by at least six months, mainly dependent on the degradable material type (PLLA for this work). [ 25 ] The capture efficiency of HA‐MVS increased in a time‐dependent manner, with 92% of the captured cells eliminated in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously discussed, chemotherapy is a widely used approach for cancer treatment, although it has drawbacks. High doses of chemotherapy can cause systemic toxicity, and the presence of large tumors can lead to poor pharmacokinetics due to interstitial fluid pressure, hindering transcapillary transport and preventing substance penetration into the tumor [31].…”
Section: Fundamentals Of the Intratumoral Implantation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kasahara et al reported in 1992 that within lung cancers, small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) were more sensitive to etoposide than non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs). [12] Following this, Dong et al showed that in NSCLC cell lines, etoposide causes a sequential increase in ROS production, glycolysis and lactate production. This ultimately leads to increased expression of MRP1/ABCC1 protein that is responsible for conferring drug resistance by causing efflux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kasahara et al. reported in 1992 that within lung cancers, small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) were more sensitive to etoposide than non‐small‐cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) [12] . Following this, Dong et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%