2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradable magnesium alloy WE43 porous scaffolds fabricated by laser powder bed fusion for orthopedic applications: Process optimization, in vitro and in vivo investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(153 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the X-ray profile of the as-extruded WE43 alloy was displayed in Figure 2 f, and specific peaks from α-Mg matrix, Mg 12 Nd second phase, and Mg 41 Nd 5 were determined, illustrating the second phases observed in the SEM image was Mg 12 Nd and Mg 41 Nd 5 . These fine second-phase particles could provide a pinning effect inhibiting grain growth and dislocation movement, thereby refining the microstructure and enhancing the mechanical strength [ 26 ]. It is worth noting that the absence of the Mg-Y seconding phase may be due to the high solid solubility of Y in the Mg matrix (12.3 wt%) [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the X-ray profile of the as-extruded WE43 alloy was displayed in Figure 2 f, and specific peaks from α-Mg matrix, Mg 12 Nd second phase, and Mg 41 Nd 5 were determined, illustrating the second phases observed in the SEM image was Mg 12 Nd and Mg 41 Nd 5 . These fine second-phase particles could provide a pinning effect inhibiting grain growth and dislocation movement, thereby refining the microstructure and enhancing the mechanical strength [ 26 ]. It is worth noting that the absence of the Mg-Y seconding phase may be due to the high solid solubility of Y in the Mg matrix (12.3 wt%) [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after summarizing the relevant literature, we found that the definition of pore size is not clear in some literature sources. Furthermore, no unified positioning and measurement methods are available ( Yavari et al, 2013 ; Amin Yavari et al, 2014 ; Soro et al, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2022 ). This problem has prompted some studies to cite findings from other literature with significant differences in the definition, localization, and measurement of pore size, leading to questioning the conclusions in their papers ( Zadpoor, 2015 ; Dziaduszewska and Zielinski, 2021 ).…”
Section: Current Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WE43 porous scaffolds were fabricated through laser powder bed fusion by Liu et al [ 85 ]. For in vivo tests, they used 45 6-month-old male New Zealand white rabbits with weights between 3 and 3.5 kg.…”
Section: In Vivo Behavior Of the Magnesium-based Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%