2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and physical correlates of DNA contamination in archaeological human bones and teeth excavated at Matera, Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several papers have reported that, despite the use of rigorous protocols [10,88], modern human DNA contamination is prevalent in amplification products from DNA extracts of ancient specimens [13,88-91]. In fact, it has been shown that even with extensive UV and bleach treatments, it is impossible to completely remove modern human DNA from ancient bones and teeth [92]. This is probably due to the porosity of bone and tooth dentine, which are the main entry routes for DNA coming from sweat, skin fragments and exhaled cells.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers have reported that, despite the use of rigorous protocols [10,88], modern human DNA contamination is prevalent in amplification products from DNA extracts of ancient specimens [13,88-91]. In fact, it has been shown that even with extensive UV and bleach treatments, it is impossible to completely remove modern human DNA from ancient bones and teeth [92]. This is probably due to the porosity of bone and tooth dentine, which are the main entry routes for DNA coming from sweat, skin fragments and exhaled cells.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If teeth are extracted from the jaw under ideal conditions, the value of external decontamination via physical removal or treatment with harsh chemicals needs to be balanced against the negative impact on endogenous DNA recovery. The resistance of teeth to contamination even when post recovery handling is not performed in an ideal manner has been demonstrated [28,29] suggesting that severe decontamination measures may not always be warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Neparáczki et al, 2016) aimed at characterizing an entire cemetery which limited the ability of sample selection, so in spite of the more reliable method their haplotype determination proved error prone. The lesson from this study is that PCR based haplotypes need to be handled cautiously, which has been well known in the aDNA field (Handt et al, 1994), (Richards et al, 1995), (Gilbert et al, 2005), (Sampietro et al, 2006). It also follows that incorrect haplotypes particularly distort sequence based statistical analysis, like Fst statistics or shared haplotype analysis applied in (Tömöry et al, 2007) and (Csősz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Contrasting Ngs and Pcr Based Sequence Datamentioning
confidence: 90%