2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioavailability of seocalcitol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the more hydrophobic LCT is more difficult to emulsify, higher concentration of Cremophor ® RH 40 was generally required to form microemulsions when using LCT compared to MCT. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in the absorption and bioavailability of seocalcitol between the two aforemen- tioned SMEDDS upon their oral administration to male rats (28). This is contrary to previous studies, where the bioavailability of danazol and halofantrine from SMEDDS containing LCT was found to be superior to SMEDDS containing MCT (22,29).…”
Section: Chemism Of Lipidscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the more hydrophobic LCT is more difficult to emulsify, higher concentration of Cremophor ® RH 40 was generally required to form microemulsions when using LCT compared to MCT. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in the absorption and bioavailability of seocalcitol between the two aforemen- tioned SMEDDS upon their oral administration to male rats (28). This is contrary to previous studies, where the bioavailability of danazol and halofantrine from SMEDDS containing LCT was found to be superior to SMEDDS containing MCT (22,29).…”
Section: Chemism Of Lipidscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Otherwise, derivatives of ethylene-glycol, glycerol, and propylene glycol can be also included (11,16,34). When choosing between co-solvent and co-surfactant, one should consider lower solubilization capacity for hydrophobic drugs observed upon diluting co-solvent-containing formulations with the aqueous phase (28). This is related to the large amount of co-solvent usually needed to improve the drug solubilization capacity, which in turn increases the risk of drug precipitation when the formulation is dispersed in aqueous media.…”
Section: Chemism Of Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely, a fixed ratio of 10% of the oil was employed as recommended to produce spontaneous L-SEDDs formulations with small DS upon dispersion [28]. Based on the literature review, many reports showed that drugs' solubilities in various oils and surfactants might vary based on the carbon chain lengths of the oils and surfactants [81], including MCT [82][83][84], and LCT [85,86]. This attitude is probably linked to the employed drug physicochemical properties [82,87].…”
Section: Emulsification Efficiency Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the more hydrophobic LCT is more difficult to emulsify, higher concentration of Cremophor® RH 40 was generally required to form microemulsions when using LCT compared to MCT. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in the absorption and bioavailability of seocalcitol between the two aforementioned SMEDDS upon their oral administration to male rats 37 . This is contrary to previous studies, where the bioavailability of danazol and halofantrine from SMEDDS containing LCT was found to be superior compared to SMEDDS containing MCT 38,39 .…”
Section: Medium Chain Triglycerides (Mct) and Related Estersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, SMEDDS compared in these studies consisted of different amounts of lipid and surfactant, whereas Grovea et al used quantitatively comparable systems. Considering the mentioned data, one can conclude that the extent of influence of MCT and LCT on the bioavailability of drugs is drug specific 37 .…”
Section: Medium Chain Triglycerides (Mct) and Related Estersmentioning
confidence: 95%