2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Titanium Dental Implants: A Comparative Systematic Review

Abstract: Animal studies and the scarce clinical trials available that have been conducted suggest that bioactive surfaces on dental implants could improve the osseointegration of such implants. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of osseointegration of titanium (Ti) dental implants using bioactive surfaces with that of Ti implants using conventional surfaces such as sandblasted large-grit acid-etched (SLA) or similar surfaces. Applying the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(240 reference statements)
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the result of successful osseointegration. The shape, material and surface of the implant used are important, as well as the technique of implant cradle preparation [ 4 , 20 , 26 , 32 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The variability of local soft and hard tissue conditions found in the cases of immediate implant insertion in the aesthetic region of the maxilla may result in different levels of difficulty and predictability of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is the result of successful osseointegration. The shape, material and surface of the implant used are important, as well as the technique of implant cradle preparation [ 4 , 20 , 26 , 32 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The variability of local soft and hard tissue conditions found in the cases of immediate implant insertion in the aesthetic region of the maxilla may result in different levels of difficulty and predictability of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive development of scientific research concerning novel materials used for the production of dental implants and the modifications of their surfaces is currently being observed. The aim of this observation is to accelerate the increase of osteointegration with the patient’s bone [ 3 , 4 ]. The research activity, which is based on the strength and durability of osteointegration, results from the patient’s expectation to expand qualifying indications for dental implantology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different alternatives, coating implants with a layer of HA is one of the most used techniques. HA is a stable and biological form of calcium phosphate, as well as a non-inflammatory, and non-immunogenic material, which strengthens the organic matrix by mineralization [82]. It is composed of ions that normally exist in physiological environments and have excellent osteoconductive and osteointegration properties.…”
Section: Ha Layer and Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted that micro-roughness surface is beneficial for osteointegration between implant and new bone, because micro-roughness surface has a larger surface area [ 10 ]. Surface modification technologies, such as acid etching and sandblasting, are widely used in Ti-based orthopedic implants for clinical applications [ 11 ]. Compared with the micro-surface, the nano-surface has a greater influence on bone-related cell behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%