2000
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-57-6-1160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioaccumulation and differential partitioning of polychlorinated biphenyls in freshwater, planktonic food webs

Abstract: Abstract:The planktonic food chain phytoplankton -zooplankton -young-of-the-year roach (Rutilus rutilus) was studied in 19 lakes in southern Sweden to investigate the bioaccumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The SPCB concentrations did not steadily increase with increasing trophic level. The SPCB concentrations in zooplankton (400 ng·g lipid -1 ) were lower than in both phytoplankton (660 ng·g lipid -1 ) and fish (890 ng·g lipid -1 ), which did not differ significantly. Lipid content explained 40% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…minimum were 6-18 times higher than in the C. finmarchicus feeding on them. Our experimental data support result from field studies where higher BAF values for PCBs were found in the size fraction of the collected material defined as phytoplankton, than in the size fraction defined as zooplankton (Berglund et al, 2000;Kannan et al, 1995). We have no obvious explanation to this reduced accumulation with increasing trophic level.…”
Section: Differences Between Phytoplankton and Zooplanktonsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…minimum were 6-18 times higher than in the C. finmarchicus feeding on them. Our experimental data support result from field studies where higher BAF values for PCBs were found in the size fraction of the collected material defined as phytoplankton, than in the size fraction defined as zooplankton (Berglund et al, 2000;Kannan et al, 1995). We have no obvious explanation to this reduced accumulation with increasing trophic level.…”
Section: Differences Between Phytoplankton and Zooplanktonsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Most ecotoxicological studies on phyto-and zooplankton are done in the field and are based on size fractionation of the plankton, equating size ranges to trophic levels (Berglund et al, 2000;Harding et al, 1997;Hargrave et al, 2000;Sobek et al, 2004). It is generally found that the bioaccumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other HOCs increase linearly with K ow for the compounds, even though the slope and the yintercept may vary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biomagnification factors are low compared with other studies on piscivorous fish (3-5; Russell et al 1995) or planktivorous fish (1-3; Hoekstra et al 2003). However, the results are similar to those found in planktonic food chains in lakes (Berglund et al 2000) where there was no biomagnification in the first trophic transfer between zooplankton and phytoplankton and only an increase (biomagnification factors = 1.5-3.0) in concentrations of the PCBs with log K OW > 6.5 in the second trophic transfer between zooplankton and planktivorous young-of-the-year roach (Rutilus rutilus). Thus, PCBs were magnified on a dry weight basis but not on a lipid weight basis in the first trophic transfer between periphyton and detritus, and invertebrates and the biomagnification factors were independent of the K OW values of the PCBs.…”
Section: Pcb Concentrations and Food Chain Bioaccumulationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, like lipids, the organic carbon fraction could not predict PCB concentrations within each of the two compartments in this study. Lipid content has been shown to accurately predict PCB accumulation in both fish and invertebrates (Kucklick and Baker 1998;Berglund et al 2000). Therefore, we used dry matter and lipid rather than carbon-normalized PCB concentrations for all compartments when testing food chain bioaccumulation and biomagnification factors in our food chains.…”
Section: Pcb Concentrations and Food Chain Bioaccumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microalgae can easily accumulate POPs, which are then transferred to higher trophic levels through the food chain because of their high lipid content and small size. The bioaccumulation of POPs by microalgae is influenced by the properties of organic compounds (such as molecular structure and hydrophobicity), and by algal lipids, which are variable between species and influenced by environmental factors (Stange & Swackhamer 1994, Berglund et al 2000, Carlson & Swackhamer 2006. Several studies reported the bioconcentration of POPs, such as PCBs, by microalgae in nutrientlimited conditions (Halling-Sørensen et al 2000, Datta 2001, Lynn et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%