2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpec.2019.8662130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-Inspired Design for Robust Power Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matsuyama (1995) is a good introduction to this literature. [See also, e.g., Venables and Smith (1986), Driffill and van der Ploeg (1993), Weitzman (1994), Bilbiie et al (2008), Ulanowicz (2009a, b), Lietaer et al (2010), Kiss and Kiss (2018), Bilbiie et al (2019), Panyam et al (2019), and Dave and Layton (2019). ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsuyama (1995) is a good introduction to this literature. [See also, e.g., Venables and Smith (1986), Driffill and van der Ploeg (1993), Weitzman (1994), Bilbiie et al (2008), Ulanowicz (2009a, b), Lietaer et al (2010), Kiss and Kiss (2018), Bilbiie et al (2019), Panyam et al (2019), and Dave and Layton (2019). ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A corollary of the tradeoff between complexity and scale is the tradeoff between adaptability and efficiency [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Adaptability arises when there are many possible actions happening in parallel that are mostly independent from one another, i.e., when the system has high complexity.…”
Section: Tradeoffs Between Complexity and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENA metrics can then be calculated using T. In this section, the ENA modeling process and the DoSO metric are elaborated, focusing on the notional SoS architectures used in this study. Interested readers may refer to previous work, which has adapted ENA for applications in industrial networks, [66][67][68][69][70][71] power grids, 72 water distribution networks, 73,74 and supply chains. 75 Consider the architecture presented in Figure 3(C).…”
Section: Sos Architectures' Doso Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%