2002
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binocular summation of chromatic changes as measured by visual reaction time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(47 reference statements)
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, further work is needed to address the influence of these factors, taking into account the transient and sustained components of the pupil response, 20,48 VRT 29 and the lower binocular summation values found at suprathreshold isoluminance. 31 The discrepancy between our results on binocular summation at suprathreshold and those reported by Collier 11 and Campbell & Green 13 at the threshold, can be explained by assuming that, at the threshold, these mechanisms present no significant activity, as might occur under suprathreshold conditions. It noteworthy that Dinse and Krüger 49 found in peristriate cortical regions, where eye control is processed, [4][5][6]41 signal-to-noise thresholds higher than near and striate areas.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, further work is needed to address the influence of these factors, taking into account the transient and sustained components of the pupil response, 20,48 VRT 29 and the lower binocular summation values found at suprathreshold isoluminance. 31 The discrepancy between our results on binocular summation at suprathreshold and those reported by Collier 11 and Campbell & Green 13 at the threshold, can be explained by assuming that, at the threshold, these mechanisms present no significant activity, as might occur under suprathreshold conditions. It noteworthy that Dinse and Krüger 49 found in peristriate cortical regions, where eye control is processed, [4][5][6]41 signal-to-noise thresholds higher than near and striate areas.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Stereoacuity and maximum disparity could be considered normal with respect to values provided by a Wheatstone stereoscope in previous experiments in which both authors also participated. 30,31 No patient has pre-existing abnormal conditions that might affect contrast sensitivity or pupil size (cataracts, glaucoma, diabetes, corneal or neuro-opthalmic diseases).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one female subject withdrew from the study due to relocation and was replaced. The mean age of the seven women was 26.1 years (range, [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and of the six men was 31.7 years (range, 24 -39).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding conflicts with one recent report 31 but is in accord with others. [32][33][34][35] For normal trichromats, R-G thresholds in Table 1 approximate the semiminor axes of corresponding color ellipses and the Y-B thresholds approximate the semimajor axes. Thus, while monocular axes may not appear much longer than binocular axes, they may represent substantial increases in ellipse area and considerable net loss of color sensitivity.…”
Section: Effect Of Mild Hypoxia On Chromatic Sensitivity 823mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the dependence of RT to chromatic contrast and spatial summation has been widely studied [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], previous RT studies have taken the average mean response from a few static experimental conditions. This has ignored the presence of correlations or memory effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%