1976
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(76)90305-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of Ampholine to transfer RNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, nucleic acids behave as polyanions and are therefore able to bind many proteins through electrostatic interactions. Second, this problem is even more severe when separation with isoelectric focusing is to be performed, as nucleic acids also bind carrier ampholytes to give complexes [21], that also bind proteins and focus to give completely artifactual results with a high amount of streaking [22]. Third, nucleic acids (especially DNA) are very long molecules that are able to increase the viscosity of the solutions considerably and also to clog the small pores of the polyacrylamide gels used to separate the proteins.…”
Section: Nucleic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, nucleic acids behave as polyanions and are therefore able to bind many proteins through electrostatic interactions. Second, this problem is even more severe when separation with isoelectric focusing is to be performed, as nucleic acids also bind carrier ampholytes to give complexes [21], that also bind proteins and focus to give completely artifactual results with a high amount of streaking [22]. Third, nucleic acids (especially DNA) are very long molecules that are able to increase the viscosity of the solutions considerably and also to clog the small pores of the polyacrylamide gels used to separate the proteins.…”
Section: Nucleic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ampholines binding to the phosphate groups of the 4 0 p antigens (Drysdale and Righetti 1972;Galante et al 1976) or possibly to the lipid moiety of the 4 0 p antigens (Phillips et al 1976) could cause this artifact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Digitalised images of 2D maps of CTAB treated samples were qualitatively compared with maps obtained with four other protocols described in the literature (use of usual buffer used for the 2D electrophoresis [12]; ampholines [13,14]; phenol:chloroform:isoamylic alcohol (25:24:1, v/v) [15] and treated with acidic extraction [4]). Table 2 compares the results by indicating the number of protein spots counted with the PDQuest Software (BioRad) on each set of maps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spot counted CTAB 507 ± 12 No treatment 357 ± 8 Ampholines 1% [13,14] 392 ± 11 Phenol:chloroform:isoamilic acid [15] 188 ± 13 Acidic extraction [4] 381 ± 4 methanol 30 min, washed twice with 3% acetic acid 20 min and kept in 1% periodic acid 3% acetic acid 20 min. Washed twice with 3% acetic acid and incubated 15 min in the dark with Schiff reagent.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation