2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding constant and transport property of S-Naproxen molecularly imprinted composite membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also of great importance to select an appropriate immersion time in polymerization solution for the PVDF membrane to obtain a good pre-polymerization support. In accordance with the literature synthesis procedures [ 35 , 36 ], it was found that the optimal polymerization time, at 60 °C, was 46 h. By varying the pre-polymerization and polymerization time, MIMs with modification degree ( D m ) of 2.40 mg/cm 2 were prepared, while the D m for the non-imprinted membranes was 2.52 mg/cm 2 . Using shorter polymerization times, lower D m , associated with a limited repeatability, were measured This indicates that MIMs and NIMs have the similar thickness of the coating layer and the modest difference may come from the washing procedure, after which the recognition cavities and molecular paths are formed in the imprinted layer [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was also of great importance to select an appropriate immersion time in polymerization solution for the PVDF membrane to obtain a good pre-polymerization support. In accordance with the literature synthesis procedures [ 35 , 36 ], it was found that the optimal polymerization time, at 60 °C, was 46 h. By varying the pre-polymerization and polymerization time, MIMs with modification degree ( D m ) of 2.40 mg/cm 2 were prepared, while the D m for the non-imprinted membranes was 2.52 mg/cm 2 . Using shorter polymerization times, lower D m , associated with a limited repeatability, were measured This indicates that MIMs and NIMs have the similar thickness of the coating layer and the modest difference may come from the washing procedure, after which the recognition cavities and molecular paths are formed in the imprinted layer [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As shown in Figure 7 , the 2-dA imprinted membrane exhibited relatively high binding affinities for 2-dA, while it did not show any binding capacity towards the other compounds. The reason for this is that the MIM can recognize its template molecule due to the existence of memory cavities of fixed size and shape, binding sites, and specific binding interactions between the target molecule and sites [ 35 ]. Also as expected, the non-imprinted (NIM) and the blank PVDF membranes did not show any binding capacity for these nucleosides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite MIMs imprinted with S-naproxen were prepared by Donato et al by photo-copolymerization of polypropylene with the functional monomer 4-vinylpiridine [154]. More recently, Wang and co-workers produced S-naproxen-imprinted hollow fibres using PVDF as membrane forming matrix [155]. Authors applied the thermal polymerization.…”
Section: Molecularly Imprinted Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are very few recent studies on the occurrence of ketoprofen in South African aqueous environments (Agunbiade and Moodley, 2016;Madikizela et al, 2014;Zunngu et al, 2017). In surface water and wastewater, ketoprofen is usually detected with other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (Laven et al, 2009;Togola et al, 2007;Yu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%