2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in children with autism spectrum disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, consistent with previous study, the BIC latency gets longer with increasing ITD (Ferber et al, 2016;Laumen et al, 2016;Benichoux et al, 2018). Interestingly, our work in mice with FXS is consistent with an increased latency of the BIC seen in a study in autistic people (ElMoazen et al, 2019), although they also see a decrease in the amplitude of the BIC. Our findings that the BIC latency is only significant in males at 0 ITD potentially suggest that there is overall slowing of binaural processing in the brain stem, which may ultimately impact binaural hearing, but that it is not dependent on ITD, which would be consistent with mice that do not rely as predominantly on ITD cues compared with other species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, consistent with previous study, the BIC latency gets longer with increasing ITD (Ferber et al, 2016;Laumen et al, 2016;Benichoux et al, 2018). Interestingly, our work in mice with FXS is consistent with an increased latency of the BIC seen in a study in autistic people (ElMoazen et al, 2019), although they also see a decrease in the amplitude of the BIC. Our findings that the BIC latency is only significant in males at 0 ITD potentially suggest that there is overall slowing of binaural processing in the brain stem, which may ultimately impact binaural hearing, but that it is not dependent on ITD, which would be consistent with mice that do not rely as predominantly on ITD cues compared with other species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, consistent with previous work, the BIC latency gets longer with increasing ITD (Ferber et al, 2016;Laumen et al, 2016;Benichoux et al, 2018). Interestingly our work in FXS mice is consistent with increased latency of the BIC seen in a study in autistic people (ElMoazen et al, 2019), though they also see a decrease in amplitude of the BIC. Our findings that the BIC latency is only significant in males at 0 ITD potentially suggests that there is overall slowing of binaural processing in the brainstem, but that it is not dependent on ITD, which would be consistent with mice that do not rely as predominantly on ITD cues compared to other species.…”
Section: Binaural Hearingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These longer latency and lower amplitude responses have been attributed to the immaturity of brainstem circuits (Li et al, 2020 ). A recent study showed delays in speech-based ABRs (Chen et al, 2019 ) and reduced binaural interaction components (BIC) of the ABR in subjects with ASD (ElMoazen et al, 2020 ). The latter study also found a significant positive correlation between the amplitude of the BIC ABR waveform and both language and social scores in subjects with ASD (ElMoazen et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%