2003
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2003.813563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary intersymbol interference channels: gallager codes, density evolution, and code performance bounds

Abstract: Abstract-We study the limits of performance of Gallager codes (low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes) over binary linear intersymbol interference (ISI) channels with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). Using the graph representations of the channel, the code, and the sum-product message-passing detector/decoder, we prove two error concentration theorems. Our proofs expand on previous work by handling complications introduced by the channel memory. We circumvent these problems by considering not just linear G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As we will state more precisely later, the marginal probability density of a message sent over a randomly chosen edge in the FG converges almost surely to a deterministic probability density that depends on the BICM ensemble parameters for large block lengths, provided that the FG is sufficiently local (e.g., the maximum degree of each node is bounded). The proof of this concentration result for BICM-ID closely follows the footsteps of analogous proofs for LDPC codes over BIOS channels [96,97], for LDPC codes over binary-input ISI channels [60], and for linear codes in multiple access Gaussian channels [23]. By way of illustration, consider a BICM ensemble based on the concatenation of a binary convolutional code with a modulation signal set through an interleaver, whose FG is shown in Figure 5.2.…”
Section: Density Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As we will state more precisely later, the marginal probability density of a message sent over a randomly chosen edge in the FG converges almost surely to a deterministic probability density that depends on the BICM ensemble parameters for large block lengths, provided that the FG is sufficiently local (e.g., the maximum degree of each node is bounded). The proof of this concentration result for BICM-ID closely follows the footsteps of analogous proofs for LDPC codes over BIOS channels [96,97], for LDPC codes over binary-input ISI channels [60], and for linear codes in multiple access Gaussian channels [23]. By way of illustration, consider a BICM ensemble based on the concatenation of a binary convolutional code with a modulation signal set through an interleaver, whose FG is shown in Figure 5.2.…”
Section: Density Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, the joint probability density of the message vector at a given iteration is a function of the (random) interleaver and of the (random) scrambling sequence. Fortunately, a powerful set of rather general results come to rescue [23,60,96,97]. As we will state more precisely later, the marginal probability density of a message sent over a randomly chosen edge in the FG converges almost surely to a deterministic probability density that depends on the BICM ensemble parameters for large block lengths, provided that the FG is sufficiently local (e.g., the maximum degree of each node is bounded).…”
Section: Density Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations