1984
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.30.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary-encounter form factor and its use in the calculation of inelastic cross sections involving Rydberg atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an alternative mechanism of collisional quenching of Rydberg states as compared to the standard mechanism of quasielastic or inelastic transitions associated with the scattering of a weakly bound electron by a perturbing atomic or molecular particle (see [40][41][42][43]). The standard mechanism proposed by Fermi [44] for the description of the spectral shift of Rydberg atomic series in a buffer rare gas, has been the subject of intensive research in studies of quasielastic l-mixing [45][46][47] and J-mixing [48] collisions, various types of inelastic transitions between highly excited states [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], and ionization of Rydberg atoms [59,60] in collisions with neutral atomic particles. For collisions of Rydberg atoms with nonpolar and weakly polar molecules the electron-perturber scattering mechanism of ionization as well as quasielastic and inelastic transitions was studied within the framework of different versions of the impulse-approximation approach [61,62,64] based on the quasifree electron model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an alternative mechanism of collisional quenching of Rydberg states as compared to the standard mechanism of quasielastic or inelastic transitions associated with the scattering of a weakly bound electron by a perturbing atomic or molecular particle (see [40][41][42][43]). The standard mechanism proposed by Fermi [44] for the description of the spectral shift of Rydberg atomic series in a buffer rare gas, has been the subject of intensive research in studies of quasielastic l-mixing [45][46][47] and J-mixing [48] collisions, various types of inelastic transitions between highly excited states [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], and ionization of Rydberg atoms [59,60] in collisions with neutral atomic particles. For collisions of Rydberg atoms with nonpolar and weakly polar molecules the electron-perturber scattering mechanism of ionization as well as quasielastic and inelastic transitions was studied within the framework of different versions of the impulse-approximation approach [61,62,64] based on the quasifree electron model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calculating the value of Equation 5, the round-off errors (loss in accuracy) quickly start to add up, and once the standard floating-point limit of a machine is reached, fail to provide real, non-infinite values. This has been remarked upon by various authors (e.g., Gounand & Petitjean 1984;Delone et al 1994;Flannery & Vrinceanu 2002) and Dewangan (2012) point out that the exact value of n for which these calculations start to break down depends on the variety of algorithms and methods used. The round-off errors and limitations of the standard floating-point machine representation of numbers have driven other methods of calculation for oscillator strengths.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Letter to the Editor where gnl(p) is the radial wavefunction of the Rydberg electron in the momentum space. The validity of this approximation in Rydberg-neutral collisions has been recently investigated by Gounand and Petitjean (1984). It is important to note that in the calculation of the cross section according to equations (1) and (2), AE in the expression for po may be neglected.…”
Section: L167 L168mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiment: $, Na(nd)+He, T = 430 K, Gallagher et a2 (1977); 0, Rb(ns)+ He, T = 520 K, Hugon et al (1980): I, Rb(np) + He, T = 460 K, Gounand et a/ (1977): 0, Na( n s ) + He, T = 425 K, Gallagher and Cooke (1979);4, Rb(ns)+Xe, T = 2 9 6 K , Hugon etal (1982);p, Rb(nd)+Xe, T = 2 9 6 K , Hugon er al (1982); *, Rb(ns)+ He, T = 296 K, Hugon et al (1982). Theory: full curves, equation (4) multiplied by ( n ' -l o ) / n ' with L,,= 1.14, L,,=-5.8; 6,= 1.35, 6,=0.014 for Na, 8, = 3.14 and 3.20 if 5 S n* S 20, 6, = 3.16 and 3.24 if 25 s n* s 45, 6, = 2.65, 6, = 1.40 for Rb; broken curves, Born approximation with a Fermi pseudopotential (Hugon er al 1982) for large n* values and impulse approach(Gounand and Petitjean 1984) for low n* values; dotted curve, scaling formula ofHickman (1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%