2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilingual aphasia and language control: A follow-up fMRI and intrinsic connectivity study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
130
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
12
130
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An fMRI connectivity study examining language recovery in a clinical population further demonstrated a strong connection between cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the connectivity studies suggest that these areas work together to inhibit interference from the non-target language. The cingulate serves to signal the prefrontal cortex of potential response conflicts and the prefrontal cortex seeks to avoid incorrect selection (Abutalebi, et al, 2009). Our finding of a very early cingulate response in the L2 condition supports this idea that the cingulate signals the possibility of response conflicts which is later responded to by the dorsolateral cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…An fMRI connectivity study examining language recovery in a clinical population further demonstrated a strong connection between cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the connectivity studies suggest that these areas work together to inhibit interference from the non-target language. The cingulate serves to signal the prefrontal cortex of potential response conflicts and the prefrontal cortex seeks to avoid incorrect selection (Abutalebi, et al, 2009). Our finding of a very early cingulate response in the L2 condition supports this idea that the cingulate signals the possibility of response conflicts which is later responded to by the dorsolateral cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…picture naming) in a mixed-language context and in a single-language (monolingual) context, and brain activity has been shown to be higher for the mixed-language context in a cortical-subcortical network of brain regions that is bilateral, but predominantly left-lateralized, and includes inferior and middle frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area (SMA), caudate, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and supramarginal gyrus (SMG). It has been proposed that this predominantly frontal cortical-subcortical network plays a crucial role in bilingual language control (Abutalebi & Green, 2008;Luk et al, 2011), and further support of this hypothesis has come from studies of bilingual aphasia (e.g., Aglioti & Fabbro, 1993;Abutalebi, Della Rosa, Tettamanti, Green, & Cappa, 2009;Abutalebi, Miozzo, & Cappa, 2000;Kho et al, 2007), intracranial stimulation (e.g., Moritz-Gasser & Duffau, 2009), and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies (for review, see Hervais-Adelman, Moser-Mercer, & Golestani, 2011). However, it is known that most of the areas in this cortical-subcortical network are also involved in task switching (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The evidence from both lesion studies (for example Abutalebi et al, 2000Abutalebi et al, , 2009 and functional imaging of bilingual language control (Abutalebi and Green, 2008;Garbin et al, 2010;Klein et al, 1994Klein et al, , 1995Klein et al, , 2006Lehtonen et al, 2005;Price et al, 1999) has tended to suggest that this function of the basal ganglia is left-lateralized. However, a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of language switching indicates that both right and left striatal structures are implicated in language switching .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%