2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2186411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilim Etiğine Aykırı Davranışlar Ve Yaptırımlar: Sosyal Ve Beşeri Bilimler Için Bir Çerçeve Önerisi (Ethical Violations and Sanctions in Scientific Publications: A Framework Proposal for Social Sciences and Humanities)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the content is focused upon subjects such as: the nature of science, scientific research, printed and web-based resource searches, preparing homework, types of plagiarism, avoidance of plagiarism, direct and indirect quotation and citation, and sanctions for plagiarism. In addition to the course, teacher candidates were given reading assignments for the importance of scientific ethics (Yaşar, 2018) and prevention of unethical behaviors Ünal, Toprak & Başpınar, 2012). However, since it is thought that it may affect the possible results of the experimental study, teacher candidates were not given any information or training with similarity/plagiarism detection programs.…”
Section: The Content Of the Science And Research Ethics Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the content is focused upon subjects such as: the nature of science, scientific research, printed and web-based resource searches, preparing homework, types of plagiarism, avoidance of plagiarism, direct and indirect quotation and citation, and sanctions for plagiarism. In addition to the course, teacher candidates were given reading assignments for the importance of scientific ethics (Yaşar, 2018) and prevention of unethical behaviors Ünal, Toprak & Başpınar, 2012). However, since it is thought that it may affect the possible results of the experimental study, teacher candidates were not given any information or training with similarity/plagiarism detection programs.…”
Section: The Content Of the Science And Research Ethics Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the analysed documents do not anticipate any differentiation between intended and accidental plagiarism in terms of punishment. Many studies (Demiral-Bakırman, 2015;Özenç-Uçak & Birinci, 2008;Sonfield, 2014;Sutherland-Smith, 2010;Ünal et al, 2012;Yanikoski, 1994;Yorke et al, 2009) confirmed that distinguishing intended and accidental plagiarism and deciding the severity of anticipated punishments are important administrative problems all around the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatür incelendiğinde bilimsel etik ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaların daha çok teorik temellere ilişkin olduğu (Oğuz, 1999;Kansu ve Ruacan, 2002;Bülbül, 2004;Tabancalı, 2004;Emiroğlu, 2005;Ruacan, 2005;Aydın, 2006;Özenç Uçak ve Birinci, 2008;İnci, 2009;Ortaş, 2010;Kıraç, 2011;Erdem, 2012;Toplu, 2012;Ünal, Toprak ve Başpınar, 2012;Keskin, 2017;Vurucu, 2019) görülmektedir. Bilimsel etik ile ilgili uygulamaya yönelik yapılan çalışmaların daha az olduğu (Köklü, 2000;Akşit ve Arda, 2003;Günbayı vd., 2013;Kurtulmuş ve Ardıç, 2013;Özden ve Ergin, 2013;Özcan ve Balcı, 2016;Çetinkaya vd., 2017;Şahinoğlu ve Bebek, 2018;Daştan, Bayraktar ve Bellikli, 2019;Dere ve Gökçınar, 2019) görülmektedir.…”
Section: Giriģunclassified