1996
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients: treatment with metal stents.

Abstract: Metal stents can be useful in the short term but have limited patency, often require repeat intervention, and have substantial complications. Long-term success depends heavily on repeat interventions or stent removal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prophylaxis with shortterm systemic antibiotics is reported to prevent septic complications effectively. 20,24 We did not experience other serious complications such as subcapsular hematoma of the liver, bleeding, or hemobilia and acute pancreatitis, as reported by others. 26 Review of the literature.…”
Section: Choice In Treatment Of Bssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Prophylaxis with shortterm systemic antibiotics is reported to prevent septic complications effectively. 20,24 We did not experience other serious complications such as subcapsular hematoma of the liver, bleeding, or hemobilia and acute pancreatitis, as reported by others. 26 Review of the literature.…”
Section: Choice In Treatment Of Bssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…31 The migration of self-expandable metal stents occurs rarely, with a frequency of less than 1%, because the surrounding tissue grows through the interstices of the stent and produces fixation, although the same process is believed to lead to occlusion eventually. [32][33][34][35] It is also believed that the shortening that occurs following placement aids security. 36 The significantly more frequent migration of plastic stents at approximately 10% 17,32,34,37,38 led Johanson et al 17 to analyse various stent characteristics and clinical factors that may contribute to proximal and distal stent migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,39 It has also been noted that distal migration of stents is more common in benign than malignant strictures. 16,17,33,[40][41][42] The possible explanation for this phenomenon being that benign stenosis is less tight, due to resolution of inflammation and mucosal oedema and also that the tumour growth in malignant strictures may help to anchor the stent and prevent migration. 32 Arhan et al, 21 however, reported that stent migration is less frequent following treatment of strictures following cholecystectomy compared to other benign aetiologies possible due to the tight fibrotic nature of these strictures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penetration requires adherence between the perforated and the penetrated organ, and does not induce intra-abdominal contamination, but eventually causes fistulae (i.e., interenteric or biliocolic [36] , colovaginal [25] or colovesicular [27] ). Downstream migration is more frequent in benign than in malignant biliary duct strictures [9,35] . Benign stenoses are not as tight because of regression of inflammatory reactions after placement of the stent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%