Significance The infrequent detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has hindered their clinical implication and their potential use in the sense of a “liquid biopsy” for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Hypothesizing that the limited blood volume commonly used for CTC analysis (1–10 mL) accounts for variable detection rates, we used leukapheresis to screen large blood volumes for CTCs. This enabled a more reliable detection of CTCs at high frequency even in nonmetastatic cancer patients. Thus, diagnostic leukapheresis may facilitate the routine clinical use of CTCs as biomarkers for personalized medicine. Combined with technologies for single-cell molecular genetics or cell biology, it may significantly improve prediction of therapy response and monitoring, especially in early systemic cancer.

Background: Portal vein embolization (PVE) has become a standard procedure to increase the future liver remnant (FLR) and enable curative resection of initially unresectable liver tumours. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of a new two-stage liver resection technique that uses in situ liver transection (ISLT) and portal vein ligation before completion hepatectomy. Conclusion:ISLT is an effective and reliable technique to induce rapid growth of the FLR, even in patients with insufficient volume increase after PVE.

Risk adjustment of patient selection and technique in ALPPS resulted in a continuous drop of early mortality and major postoperative morbidity, which has meanwhile reached standard outcome measures accepted for major liver surgery.

Endoscopic biliary stent insertion is a well-established procedure. It is especially successful in treating postoperative biliary leaks, and may prevent surgical intervention. A routine change of endoprostheses after 3 mo is a common practice but this can be prolonged to 6 mo. We reported a colonic perforation due to biliary stent dislocation and migration to the rectosigmoid colon, and reviewed the literature.

Introduction Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) entails high-risk surgery with substantial postoperative mortality reported up to 18%, even in specialized centers. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of PHC patients who underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) to patients with a small functional liver remnant who underwent resection without ALPSS. Methods All patients who underwent ALPPS for PHC were identified from the international ALPPS registry and matched controls were selected from a standard resection cohort from two centers based on future remnant liver size. Outcomes included morbidity, mortality, and overall survival. Results Of the 37 patients who had undergone ALPPS for PHC in the registry, 29 had sufficient data for analyses. ALPPS for PHC was associated with a 48% (14/29) 90-day mortality and median OS of 6 months. A total of 257 patients underwent major liver resection for PHC without ALPPS. The 90-day mortality was 13% and median OS 46 months. The 29 ALPPS patients were matched to 29 patients resected without ALPPS, with similar future liver remnant volume (P=0.480). Mortality in the matched control group was 24% (P=0.100) and median OS was 27 months (P = 0.064). Discussion Outcomes of ALPPS for PHC appear inferior when compared to standard extended resections in high-risk patients. Considering these outcomes, portal vein embolization should remain the preferred method to increase future remnant liver volume in PHC patients. ALPPS is not recommended for PHC due to the 48% 90-day mortality in expert centers.

No abstract

Background. ALPPS is found to increase the resectability of primary and secondary liver malignancy at the advanced stage. The aim of the study was to verify the surgical and oncological outcome of ALPPS for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods. The study cohort was based on the ALPPS registry with patients from 31 international centers between August 2009 and January 2018. Propensity score matched patients receiving chemotherapy only were selected from the SEER database as controls for the survival analysis.

No abstract