Bilateral trade flows and comparative advantage: does the size matter?

Abstract

The paper applies a variant of the gravity model to test whether there is a positive link between the size of trade flows and the extent to which they follow the pattern of comparative advantage. Using UNCTAD's 2016 trade data for every country in the world, and 255 merchandise items, we show that countries trading more with each other tend to follow the patterns of comparative advantages more than countries with smaller mutual trade flows. While smaller trade flows can be easily influenced by business decisions of individual companies or one-off trade contracts going against trade pattern predictions, this is not the case with larger flows. We also find signs that holding trade volume constant, more distant countries trade less than geographically proximate countries, in line with predictions from comparative advantage. The results are valid for the whole database of all country pairs in world trade, but the goodness of fit increases with the number of items these country pairs trade in. The paper is the first insight into the topic and can be expanded to a higher level of disaggregation and more variables in future research.

The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Education Contents

“…As new jobs will be created for the implementation of Industry 4.0 concept, employers will require new, especially digital skills and abilities from employees. Šauer et al (2019) and Grančay and Dudáš (2019) indicate that there is a need to change teaching in secondary schools and, instead of narrowly being specialized in one area, the focus should be on a much broader overview, as people need to be educated in systemic and interdisciplinary thinking within all types of schools, including non-technical ones. Schwab (2018) and Roškot et al (2020) argue that Industry 4.0 does not consider the main risk of job losses, but the fact that the changes and the resulting consequences will not be captured in time.…”

Does Ethiopian Competitive in Export of Coffee so far and What Determines it? Evidence from Revealed Comparative Advantage and Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model

“…The implication is that country's trade pattern having comparative a country may experience not/less competitive due to the fact that, some bilateral trade is small in amount and not fully inlined with its RCA (Martin & Tomáš, 2019). Once more, relatively high transaction cost in coffee trading, no emphasis placed on quality control to improve the country's performance, as mirrored by decreasing of the RCA from 11.02 in 1990 to 6.90 in 1991, with the RSCA decreasing from 0.83 to 0.75 thereby total export also decreases in this period as stated.…”

Trade within South Asia: Unrealistic Expectations

“…The main reason is that India can meet the import requirements of the other partner countries to a large extent, as it has a comparative advantage through a large export basket (Akram, 2015, 2016; Akram & Sherwani, 2016a; Akram et al, 2014; Batra, 2004; Nath & Goswami, 2018). However, the other members are not able to meet the needs of the large import basket of India, due to which India has to depend upon non-member countries for much of her import requirement (Abbas & Waheed, 2017; Grancay & Dudas, 2019; Mahmood & Nishat, 2004; Naseer et al, 2019). But this does not mean that there is no further scope of trade increments, as some analysists suggest a perceptible untapped estimated trade potential in SAFTA (Naeher, 2015).…”