2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Versus Distraction Osteogenesis for Advancement of the Retrognathic Mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skeletal relapse after BSSO for mandibular advancement is a complex multifactorial phenomenon, where factors as the amount of advancement, the type and material of fixation, low and high mandibular plane angle, condylar resorption, control of the proximal segment, soft tissue and muscle tension, remaining growth and remodelling, skills and experience of the surgeon may contribute to skeletal relapse [ 24-26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Skeletal relapse after BSSO for mandibular advancement is a complex multifactorial phenomenon, where factors as the amount of advancement, the type and material of fixation, low and high mandibular plane angle, condylar resorption, control of the proximal segment, soft tissue and muscle tension, remaining growth and remodelling, skills and experience of the surgeon may contribute to skeletal relapse [ 24-26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential promise of distraction osteogenesis is that because of the lengthening of the mandible occurs slowly, the soft tissue stretch associated with the lengthening can be more readily accommodated to the masticatory system. Moreover, distraction osteogenesis reduces the incidence of neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve after advancement of the retrognathic mandible compared with BSSO [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the advantages of Balcony techniques is avoidance of extra depth in mentolabial fold which makes unaesthetic appearance in routine techniques especially in short-faced patients with deep mentolabial fold and everted lower lip [8, 9]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of mandibular advancement required exceeded 10 mm. The second option was rejected because, compared with BSSO, mandibular DO significantly reduces the incidence of neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve and the risk of relapse is lower in the case of large mandibular advancement (> 7 mm) [ 9 , 10 ]. It has been suggested that the smallest preoperative cross-sectional area of the upper airway should be considered for preoperative selection of the maxilla or mandible, or both, for advancement because there is a significant relationship between the narrowest cross-section of the upper airway and the probability of OSA [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unclear how to achieve a stable result for a patient who requires a large mandibular advancement [ 9 , 10 ]. In recent times, skeletal anchorage, for example, by means of miniscrews, has been widely used to enhance anchorage in craniofacial surgery applications [ 11 13 ] because it has been reported that use of such devices after mandibular setback surgery helps to prevent an increase in lower facial height [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%