BackgroundPeriapical radiolucency is the radiographic sign of inflammatory bone lesions around the apex of the tooth. We determined the prevalence and predictors of periapical radiolucency in patients with cirrhosis and the association with systemic inflammation status and cirrhosis-related complications.MethodsA total of 110 cirrhosis patients were consecutively enrolled. Periapical radiolucency was defined as the presence of radiolucency or widening of the periapical periodontal ligament space to more than twice the normal width. Predictors of periapical radiolucency and the association with systemic inflammation markers and cirrhosis-related complications were explored by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.ResultsPeriapical radiolucency was present in one or more teeth in 46% of the patients. Strong predictors were gross caries (odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43–6.79) and severe periodontitis (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.04–15.20). Also old age (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.19) and smoking (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.02–17.62) were predictors. However, cirrhosis etiology (alcoholic vs nonalcoholic) or severity (Model of End-Stage Liver Disease score) were not predictors. The patients with periapical radiolucency had higher C-reactive protein (15.8 mg/L vs 8.1 mg/L, P=0.02) and lower albumin contents (25 g/L vs 28 g/L, P=0.04) than those without. Furthermore, the patients with periapical radiolucency had a higher prevalence of cirrhosis-related complications such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and/or variceal bleeding (46% vs 27%, P=0.05).ConclusionPeriapical radiolucency is often present as an element of poor oral health status and likely has an adverse clinical significance, which should motivate diagnostic and clinical attention to the findings.

No abstract

Prior studies have indicated an excess risk of gastroduodenal ulcers and esophagus perforations with the use of bisphosphonates. However, little is known about the contribution of comorbid conditions and concomitant drug use on this risk. We studied the risk of esophagus and gastric events in patients on a wide range of drugs against osteoporosis both before and after initiation of these drugs. We studied a nationwide register-based cohort from Denmark with all users of drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) as cases and three age- and sex-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683). In a crude analysis, most drugs were already associated with an increased risk of esophagitis, esophageal ulcerations, or esophageal perforations or gastroduodenal ulcers before initiation of the drugs. Upon adjustment, this excess risk disappeared for most drugs except parathyroid hormone and its analogues, etidronate and clodronate. Only for etidronate, alendronate, and raloxifene were sufficient data present for events after initiation of the drugs, and for these, an increased risk was present for all events except gastroduodenal ulcers with raloxifene. Several drugs against osteoporosis are associated with an increased risk of esophagitis, esophageal ulcers, esophageal perforation, and gastroduodenal ulcers. However, the increase was already present before initiation of the drug for several types of drugs against osteoporosis. This points at an effect of the underlying condition being treated or comorbid conditions and drugs being provided in patients with osteoporosis, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids.

We studied the association between bisphosphonate use and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter and the effect of confounders such as heart and lung disease in a nationwide retrospective cohort from Denmark. All users of bisphosphonates and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) were the exposed group and three age- and gender-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683) were the nonexposed group. The main outcome measure was atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Before initiation of treatment against osteoporosis, no excess of atrial fibrillation or flutter was present for any drug except for etidronate (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.29). After initiation of treatment, raloxifene was not associated with any excess risk of atrial fibrillation (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.72-1.33). Etidronate (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14) and alendronate (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.20) were associated with an excess risk of atrial fibrillation after treatment start if statistical adjustments were made for cardiovascular disease. However, this association disappeared upon statistical adjustment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (etidronate HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.10; alendronate HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.15). In patients using etidronate (12.5% vs. 3.8%) and alendronate (11.4% vs. 4.6%) major differences were present in prevalence of COPD at start of treatment compared to matched controls. In conclusion, oral bisphosphonates do not seem to be associated with an excess risk of atrial fibrillation. Any excess risk seen in prior studies may be due to confounding from COPD.

Bisphosphonates seem associated with an increased risk of DVT/PE. However, the association does not seem to be causal.