2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral retinal microglial response to unilateral optic nerve transection in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPL in the retina contralateral to the injured optic nerve showed a small, transient elevation of Zn 2+ ( Fig. S2 A-C), reminiscent of other contralateral effects reported after unilateral optic nerve injury (64). Because the contralateral signal changes over time, we used the normal, intact retina as a reference throughout the study, always staining control and experimental retinas together.…”
Section: Znmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The IPL in the retina contralateral to the injured optic nerve showed a small, transient elevation of Zn 2+ ( Fig. S2 A-C), reminiscent of other contralateral effects reported after unilateral optic nerve injury (64). Because the contralateral signal changes over time, we used the normal, intact retina as a reference throughout the study, always staining control and experimental retinas together.…”
Section: Znmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Experimental unilateral transection of the optic nerve also causes acute glial activation of the retina on the contralateral side (1)(2)(3). These experiments suggest that the processes of bilateral glial activation actually may also occur on the level of the retinal ganglion cells in the visual tract in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed in the basic planes using the following sequences: T1 TFE SAG 3D 1x1x1 mm 3 , TR=8.1 ms, TE=3.7 ms, NSA 1, 170 slices; T2 mDIXON COR 2.5 mm, TR=3,000 ms, TE=80 ms, 36 slices; T2 4 mm TRA, TR=3,000 ms, TE=80 ms, NSA 1, 30 slices; FLAIR 4 mm, TR=11,000 ms, TE=125 ms; VenBold, TR=15 ms, TE=21 ms, NSA 2, 3DFFE 1x1x1 mm 3 , 290 slices; T1 IR COR 5 mm, TR=3873 ms, TE=15 ms, NSA 1, 28 slices, gap 1; and DWI 4 mm, TR=3,443 ms, TE=76 ms, b-factor 0-800, 30 slices. RNFL and GCC were examined using SD-OCT RTvue 100 with navigation on the right and fixation of a light point 37 and 50 months from the first ophthalmological testing on the left.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 In the case of an optic nerve injury, microglia density increases from 3 days after injury onwards and only returns to baseline numbers after 6 weeks. 97 This sustained increase coincides with the period during which RGC death occurs, and microglia actively phagocytize debris from these RGCs and their axons. 97,98 Notably, the increase in microglial cell number after optic nerve injury may not only originate from local proliferation but also from the infiltration of blood-derived macrophages.…”
Section: Resident Inflammatory Cellsmicrogliamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…97,98 Notably, the increase in microglial cell number after optic nerve injury may not only originate from local proliferation but also from the infiltration of blood-derived macrophages. 97 Since it has long been difficult to discriminate between resident microglia and infiltrating macrophages, 99 the relative contribution of these processes remains unclear.…”
Section: Resident Inflammatory Cellsmicrogliamentioning
confidence: 99%