2014
DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big Data and U.S. Public Policy

Abstract: This paper examines the growing recognition of the phenomenon called "Big Data" and the policy implications it poses. It is argued that a core policy issue is personal and organizational privacy. At the same time there is a belief that analysis of "Big Data" offers potentially to provide public sector policy makers with extensive new information that would inform policy at unprecedentedly detailed levels. Despite this potential to improve the policy-making process data often contain individual identifiable inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emerging focus on 'inclusive innovation'also labelled as 'pro-poor', 'base-of-the pyramid', 'social', 'below-the-radar' or 'grassroots' innovation (Mulgan 2006;Kaplinsky 2011;Cozzens and Sutz 2012;Ramani, SadreGhazi, and Duysters 2012) 3 has attempted to bridge this gap, opening new frontiers to tackle major societal challenges. It has created opportunities to fight corruption, encourage accountable democratic systems and public policy, promote grassroots mobilization and citizen engagement, and reduce local conflict (Castells 2007;Pentland 2014;Stough and McBride 2014;Nicholson, Nugroho, and Rangaswamy 2016;World Bank 2016).…”
Section: Intersections Of Innovation and Peacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging focus on 'inclusive innovation'also labelled as 'pro-poor', 'base-of-the pyramid', 'social', 'below-the-radar' or 'grassroots' innovation (Mulgan 2006;Kaplinsky 2011;Cozzens and Sutz 2012;Ramani, SadreGhazi, and Duysters 2012) 3 has attempted to bridge this gap, opening new frontiers to tackle major societal challenges. It has created opportunities to fight corruption, encourage accountable democratic systems and public policy, promote grassroots mobilization and citizen engagement, and reduce local conflict (Castells 2007;Pentland 2014;Stough and McBride 2014;Nicholson, Nugroho, and Rangaswamy 2016;World Bank 2016).…”
Section: Intersections Of Innovation and Peacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the future imaginary of data? Thus far the topics of data science engagement have focussed on privacy and consent (Joseph & Johnson, 2013;Schintler & Kulkarni, 2014;Stough & McBride, 2014). For example, Cameron et al's (2014) Dialogue on Data sought "to explore public understanding and views of administrative data and data linking".…”
Section: Proposition Five: Ensure Holistic Public Participation That mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, policies regarding privacy and Big Data can be implemented at two levels: federal and state. Treatments of US Big Data policy generally show a lack of coherent federal policy that crosses sectors [6] [3], with most policies specifically focusing on particular sectors like healthcare, education, and financial institutions. Data policies are contained within broader privacy legislation like HIPAA, FERPA, and GLBA/FCRA for those sectors respectively.…”
Section: B Policy Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%