Bien pratiquer la nature... pour protéger les Calanques ?

Ginelli, Ludovic; Marquet, Vincent; Deldrève, Valérie

doi:10.3917/ethn.143.0525

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Its application in the case of the Calanques National Park, however, was based on local power relationships and dominant norms regarding "good uses" that determined which local users were able to benefit from such recognition (Ginelli et al, 2014). These norms were apparently consensual during the dialogue process, as they were more broadly in the public sphere, including within the protest movement against the creation of the national park.…”

Section: Unequal Access To the Calanques: Who Should Shoulder The Envmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are National Parks Inherently Unequal? The 2006 French Park Reform and its Initial Implementation in Mainland France

Deldrève

Claeys

2016

Desenvolv. Meio Ambiente

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:In France, like in other parts of the world, environmental-protection policies appear to have taken note of local resistance driven by the eviction of populations and restrictions on their use of certain areas. The amendment to the law on French national parks (2006 reform) as such recognized that local populations can help to protect natural environments, as well as their right to participate in defining the charter (or spatial plan) of new parks. This article analyses the creation and local acceptance of the Calanques National Park, a peri-urban park and the first of a new generation of parks in mainland France. Our approach is based on the analytical framework of environmental effort. Using a qualitative corpus of semi-structured interviews and direct observation, we explore three analytical axes. We begin by analyzing the consultation process conducted during the creation of the park. This points up inequalities in access to the public sphere and underscores that only a few, wellendowed user-organizations truly helped define the "good use" of the Calanques that became a reference in the park's charter. Then we examine how such unequal user participation impacted the wording used in the charter and the distribution of environmental effort demanded of different users. Lastly, the first two observations lead us to question the acceptability of the effort required and its division among users, particularly since the consultation process has been strongly criticized. We question how fairly the effort required by the park's creation was distributed, particularly given the lack of information and limited legitimacy afforded to the consultation process. Finally, we look at the blaming that has taken place amongst different users of the park -a process compounded for many of those interviewed by their fear of being deprived (unjustifiably, they felt) of their freedom to access nature. RESUMO:Na França, como em outras partes do mundo, políticas de proteção ao meio ambiente parecem ter notado a resistência local impulsionada pela expulsão de populações e restrições sobre o uso de determinadas áreas. A alteração na lei sobre parques nacionais franceses (Reforma de 2006) reconheceu que as populações locais podem ajudar a proteger ambientes naturais, bem como o seu direito de participar na definição da escritura (ou plano espacial) de novos parques. Este artigo analisa a criação e a aceitação local do Parque Nacional de Calanques, um parque periurbano e o primeiro de uma nova geração de parques na França continental. A nossa abordagem baseia-se no quadro analítico do esforço ambiental. Usando um corpus qualitativo de entrevistas semiestruturadas e observação direta, exploramos três eixos analíticos. Começamos por analisar o processo de consulta realizado durante a criação do parque. Isto aponta as desigualdades de acesso à esfera pública e ressalta que apenas algumas organizações de usuários dotadas de recursos realmente ajudaram a definir o "bom uso" de Calanques, o que se tornou uma referência na Escritura do ...

show abstract

Section: Unequal Access To the Calanques: Who Should Shoulder The Envmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are National Parks Inherently Unequal? The 2006 French Park Reform and its Initial Implementation in Mainland France

Deldrève

Claeys

2016

Desenvolv. Meio Ambiente

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Par exemple, les chiens en liberté sont interdits, sauf pour les chasseurs, de même les feux sont prohibés, mais les barbecues des cabanonniers sont tolérés. Ces processus de sélection tendent à délégitimer les pratiques populaires contemporaines au proit d'un « bon usage de la nature » correspondant in ine aux usages caractéristiques des couches moyennes et supérieures, érigés en tradition et appréhendés comme l'alternative positive à la fréquentation de masse (Ginelli et al, 2014).…”

Section: Cadres Théorique Et Méthodologiqueunclassified

Quand les Calanques deviennent Parc National : disputes autour de la définition et de la répartition des efforts environnementaux et urbains induits

Claeys¹,

Arlette²,

Barthélémy³

et al. 2016

norois

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Outdoor Leisure Activities at Odds with the City? Arcachon Bay and the Massif Des Calanques

Ginelli

2020

Reclaiming and Rewilding River Cities for Outdoor Recreation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bien pratiquer la nature... pour protéger les Calanques ?

Cited by 13 publications

References 17 publications

Are National Parks Inherently Unequal? The 2006 French Park Reform and its Initial Implementation in Mainland France

Are National Parks Inherently Unequal? The 2006 French Park Reform and its Initial Implementation in Mainland France

Quand les Calanques deviennent Parc National : disputes autour de la définition et de la répartition des efforts environnementaux et urbains induits

Outdoor Leisure Activities at Odds with the City? Arcachon Bay and the Massif Des Calanques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About