2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x15001958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional synaptic plasticity can explain bidirectional retrograde effects of emotion on memory

Abstract: Emotional events can cither impair or enhance memory for immediately preceding items, '["he GANK model explains this bidirectional effect as a glulamale "priority" signal that modulates noradrenaline release depending on arousal state. We argue for an alternative explanation: that priority itself evokes phasic noradrenaline release. Thus, contrasting K-l memory effects are explained by a mechanism based on the Bienensloek-Cooper-Munro theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These peri-oddball effects are modulated by task (Anderson, Wais, & Gabrieli, 2006), stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) (Schmidt & Schmidt, 2016;Tulving, 1968), retention intervals and arousal characteristics of the items (Mather & Sutherland, 2011;Schmidt & Schmidt, 2016). Furthermore, peri-oddball effects have been proposed to occur as an encoding disruption of the item preceding the emotional stimulus at the synaptic and/or systems level (Strange et al, 2003;Strange & Galarza-Vallejo, 2016). Others, however, have proposed that retrograde amnesic effects in free recall could be due to item unavailability at retrieval, and can be reversed by cueing recall (Detterman, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peri-oddball effects are modulated by task (Anderson, Wais, & Gabrieli, 2006), stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) (Schmidt & Schmidt, 2016;Tulving, 1968), retention intervals and arousal characteristics of the items (Mather & Sutherland, 2011;Schmidt & Schmidt, 2016). Furthermore, peri-oddball effects have been proposed to occur as an encoding disruption of the item preceding the emotional stimulus at the synaptic and/or systems level (Strange et al, 2003;Strange & Galarza-Vallejo, 2016). Others, however, have proposed that retrograde amnesic effects in free recall could be due to item unavailability at retrieval, and can be reversed by cueing recall (Detterman, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors discuss their results with respect to the "glutamate amplifies noradrenergic effects" (GANE) model (explained in detail in Mather, Clewett, Sakaki, & Harley, 2016). However, this explanation is subject to current debate, with authors proposing an alternative model (Strange & Galarza-Vallejo, 2016) that assumes non-linear shifts in locus coeruleus (LC) activity as the underlying mechanism for the bi-directional effects of negative deviants on preceding neutral standard information.…”
Section: Detailed Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, peri-oddball effects (i.e. for items surrounding the oddballs) have been proposed to occur as an encoding disruption of the item preceding the emotional stimulus at the synaptic and/or systems level [ 8 , 14 ]. Others, however, have proposed that retrograde amnesic effects in free recall could be due to item inaccessibility at retrieval, which can disappear by cueing recall [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%