2015
DOI: 10.1021/ar5004626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidentate, Monoanionic Auxiliary-Directed Functionalization of Carbon–Hydrogen Bonds

Abstract: CONSPECTUS In recent years, carbon–hydrogen bond functionalization has evolved from an organometallic curiosity to mainstream applications in the synthesis of complex natural products and drugs. The use of C–H bonds as a transformable functional group is advantageous because these bonds are the most abundant functionality in organic molecules. One-step conversion of these bonds to the desired functionality shortens synthetic pathways, saving reagents, solvents, and labor. Less chemical waste is generated as we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
265
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,160 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(104 reference statements)
8
265
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the primary amines with a cyclic alkyl group reacted smoothly in this catalytic system (2j and 2k). Although many successful examples for functionalizing unactivated secondary sp 3 C−H bonds have been reported with the installation of a mono-or bidentate directing group on the substrates [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] , direct functionalization of these bonds remains a great challenge with carbonyl compounds using a transient directing group 37 and free aliphatic amines 23,30,31 , presumably due to the inherent steric hindrance. In this catalytic system, substrate 1l with cyclic methylene C−H bonds provided the γ-arylated product 2l in 23% yield, while arylation of noncyclic secondary C−H bonds was not realized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the primary amines with a cyclic alkyl group reacted smoothly in this catalytic system (2j and 2k). Although many successful examples for functionalizing unactivated secondary sp 3 C−H bonds have been reported with the installation of a mono-or bidentate directing group on the substrates [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] , direct functionalization of these bonds remains a great challenge with carbonyl compounds using a transient directing group 37 and free aliphatic amines 23,30,31 , presumably due to the inherent steric hindrance. In this catalytic system, substrate 1l with cyclic methylene C−H bonds provided the γ-arylated product 2l in 23% yield, while arylation of noncyclic secondary C−H bonds was not realized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9c This requirement is met in aminoquinoline amides ( 1 ). It is conceivable that the amide functionality in these complexes could be replaced with a phosphinic amide group ( 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Hartwig reported γ -C–H silylation of primary and secondary bonds of alcohols (and ketones via hydrosilylation) employing type-3 tether 23 (Scheme 2) via intramolecular dehydrogenative Si–H/C–H coupling. 41 Other approaches usually rely on the use of strongly coordinating bidentate DGs and/or weakly coordinating groups, introduced by Daugulis 42 and Yu, 43 respectively. The former approach relies on the realization of a N , N -chelation, which was proven efficient for remote TM-catalyzed aliphatic C–H activation reactions.…”
Section: C(sp3)–h Functionalization Via Silicon Tethersmentioning
confidence: 99%