2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidens identification using the noncoding regions of chloroplast genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (both reared from an unidentified species of Celastraceae). This intraspecific variation for the locus is not unprecedented and has been reported previously (Taberlet et al , 2007; Tsai et al , 2008). However, it does mean that in examples of 1‐ or 2‐bp differences in trnL sequences we do not know whether this is associated with intraspecific or interspecific variation without being able to identify the plants in another way.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…3 (both reared from an unidentified species of Celastraceae). This intraspecific variation for the locus is not unprecedented and has been reported previously (Taberlet et al , 2007; Tsai et al , 2008). However, it does mean that in examples of 1‐ or 2‐bp differences in trnL sequences we do not know whether this is associated with intraspecific or interspecific variation without being able to identify the plants in another way.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Assessment of the potential of DNA barcoding to distinguish between plant varieties of agri-food interest would be valuable for both breeders and farmers. Whereas the utility of DNA barcoding in species identification has been widely investigated, the intraspecific discrimination of single varietal genotypes, such as clones, pure lines, and hybrids, has been poorly investigated, and few studies have focused on the use of DNA barcoding as a sufficiently informative technique to be exploited for the genetic identification of closely related crop varieties (Tsai et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of trace botanical evidence is a developing forensic discipline and techniques based on molecular biology should support and complement traditional forensic botany in the identification of evidence. The problem of reproducibility and standardization, especially from degraded specimens, prevents the use of classical methods in routine forensic investigations [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] but the use of genetic markers could have the potential to overcome shortcomings associated with traditional forensic botany, and it has been recently proposed in forensic applications [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%