2014
DOI: 10.13104/jksmrm.2014.18.3.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biceps Femoris Tendon and Lateral Collateral Ligament: Analysis of Insertion Pattern Using MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are also many practical advantages to studying these tendons, that thereby constitute complications when assessing the collateral ligaments. First, in contrast to the thick and broad Achilles and patellar tendons, the collateral ligaments are small, with complex anatomy (Table 1), and can be difficult to identify on ultrasound; the rope-like lateral collateral ligament (LCL) typically extends from the lateral femoral epicondyle to the fibular head, where it first conjoins with the biceps femoris tendon (Otake et al, 2007; Shin et al, 2014), though significant anatomical variation exists (Shin et al, 2014), and the flat and thin medial collateral ligament (MCL) (Otake et al, 2007) is composed of multiple structures (Robinson et al, 2002) that also display distinct mechanical properties (Robinson et al, 2005). …”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also many practical advantages to studying these tendons, that thereby constitute complications when assessing the collateral ligaments. First, in contrast to the thick and broad Achilles and patellar tendons, the collateral ligaments are small, with complex anatomy (Table 1), and can be difficult to identify on ultrasound; the rope-like lateral collateral ligament (LCL) typically extends from the lateral femoral epicondyle to the fibular head, where it first conjoins with the biceps femoris tendon (Otake et al, 2007; Shin et al, 2014), though significant anatomical variation exists (Shin et al, 2014), and the flat and thin medial collateral ligament (MCL) (Otake et al, 2007) is composed of multiple structures (Robinson et al, 2002) that also display distinct mechanical properties (Robinson et al, 2005). …”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thought that this angle might be related to the distal variative insertion of the LCL and SI of the proximal LCL. Typically, LCL attaches to the head of the fibula in the form of a conjoint tendon formed with the biceps femoris tendon, but it can also attach with various extensions to the lateral plateau of the tibia and the fibular head (6). In our study, we formed three groups to evaluate this variation according to their insertions to make MRI examination simpler.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It lies between the lateral condylar region of the femur and classically the head of the fibula (2,3). However, the distal attachment site may vary (46). The LCL is more important in limiting varus stress than other posterolateral corner structures (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%