Bibliometrics and Social Network Analysis of the Nanotechnology Field

Rueda, Guillermo; Gerdsri, Pisek; Kocaoglu, Dundar F.

doi:10.1109/picmet.2007.4349633

Cited by 56 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bibliometric analysis is limited by the information available. Therefore, the information sources must be reliable and suitable to perform the analysis and to make the best decisions [35], hence the importance of choosing an appropriate database. The ISI, Scopus and Google Scholar databases are available and up-to-date, and therefore their use in the literature is very prevalent.…”

Section: Database Choicementioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The topic of green innovation (GI) has increasingly attained organizational relevance due to its contribution to the satisfaction of environmental needs while concurrently enabling companies to differentiate themselves from their competitors, and hence attain sustainable competitive advantages. In this context, we conducted a detailed analysis of 618 papers on green innovation from the Web of Science (WoS) database for the 1971-2015 period. This paper develops a bibliometric analysis with the aim of assessing the key papers in the field and identifying the most substantive contributions to the literature. This study presents the following findings: (i) the chronological development of the discipline; (ii) the research trends and popular issues in this field; (iii) the antecedent variables acting as key drivers of GI in these studies; and (iv) the main outcomes of GI. Therefore, this paper provides the past, the present and the potential future of this specific topic and serves as an orientation and guide for researchers who are new to the topic of GI; it also enhances their knowledge concerning which journals, authors and articles they may consult while creating their theoretical framework or designing future research models.

show abstract

Section: Database Choicementioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…관계 수준 분석은 네트워크 내 임의의 액터간에 상호 호혜적인 양자관계를 갖고 있는가가 분석이 되는 것이다 [23] . 본 연 구에서 주로 활용하고자하는 것은 액터 수준의 분석이며, 사회연결 망분석을 활용하는 다른 연구들에서도 액터 수준의 분석을 주로 수행하고 있다 [2,6,7,11,15,22,24,27,35] . 액터 수준 분석에서 다루는 중심성(centrality)은 전체 연결망에 서 중심에 위치하는 정도를 의미하며, 핵심적인 액터가 누구인가 를 네트워크 내 액터가 차지하는 중심적 위치의 관점에서 설명한 다 [13,33,41] .…”

Section: 서 론unclassified

“…기업 네트워크의 특성을 분석하는 추세와 별도로 논문 서지데이 터를 활용하여 연구동향을 분석하는 흐름도 존재한다. 데이터를 근 간으로 공저자 네트워크를 분석하거나 [10,11,15,18,21,42] , 키워드 네트 워크를 구성하여 해당 주제 분야의 주요 연구자가 누구인지, 어떠 한 키워드가 성장, 도태 되었는지를 분석하는 것이다 [20,22,40,45] . 공 저자 네트워크 선행연구로는 임혜선과 장태우가 물류 분야 학술지 의 공저자 네트워크 및 연구주제를 분석하여 물류분야의 협력연구 형태와 주제를 분석하였다 [18] .…”

Section: 사회연결망 분석의 기존 연구 고찰unclassified

“…[37] , 나노분야의 연구동향분석은 주 로 사회 연결망 분석을 활용하여 특정분야의 연구동향에 대해 분석 하고 있음을 알 수 있다 [11,15,25,26,39,42] . 본 연구에서는 선행연구들에 나오는 특정 나노기술분야에 대한 개별연구가 아닌 향후 유망할 것으로 보이는 복수의 나노기술들에 대한 근거자료를 획득·생성하 기 위한 방법론을 개발하고자 제4기 나노기술종합발전계획의 30 …”

Section: 나노기술 연구동향의 기존 연구 고찰unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Analysis of Co-Authorship and Keyword Network for Nanotechnology: Carbon Nanomaterials Field

Bae¹,

Kim²,

Shin³

et al. 2017

Journal of The Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[3][4][5] . 나노기술은 범용기술(GPT) 측면이 강하여 IT, BT, ET, ST, CT 등 핵심기술 분야와 상승적 융합을 통해 국가 산업경쟁력의 획기적 향상에 기여할 것으로 기대되고 있다 [3] . 이러한 배경에서 한국은 2001년 나노기술개발촉진법 제정 이후 5년마다 나노기술종합발전계획을 수립·추진하고 있고 [32] , 국 가적 투자의 시작점인 2001년 이후 14년간 나노기술분야 총 투자 액은 3조 9,800억에 달하였으며, 그 성과로 2008년 기준 나노기술 4대 강국이라는 위상을 차지하였다 [29,31] . 이처럼 나노기술에 대한 정부의 투자는 주목할 만한 성과를 나타내며 . 이러한 국가전략을 실현시키기 위해서 는 30개 나노기술과 관련된 현황을 객관적으로 파악하고 그 트렌 Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers 26:1 (2017) 172~184https: //doi.org/10.7735/ksmte.2017.26.2.172 J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Technol. Eng. ISSN 2508 University, 55, Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Kyeongi-do, 15588, Korea ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACTArticle history:Nanotechnology is a leading branch of technology and is expected to improve national industrial competitiveness. For maintaining a sustainable growth in nanotechnology, Korean government has set up specific plans from a long-term perspective. One of these plans is tracking and promoting certain potential technologies called Future 30 Nanotechnologies. This study aims to develop an analysis framework for comprehending the Future 30 Nanotechnologies. We applied this framework to the carbon nanomaterials field. Through co-authorship and keyword network analysis, we identified the research trends of three countries (i.e., Korea, US, and China.). This research framework could be utilized in the development of a nanotechnology policy.

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics is a way of using a set of methods to quantitatively analyse academic literature (White and McCain 1989). It is an effective approach for exploring research tendency and knowledge gaps, and has been proved in many research areas, such as global climate change (Li et al 2011), cancer (Ugolini et al 2012), stem cell (Li et al 2009), biological invasion (Qiu and Chen 2009), and nanotechnology (Rueda et al 2007). For example, Sullivan et al (2008) found that, despite increased funding in cancer research, the slow growth rate in research outputs has led to a 6 % annual cost increase for publishing research papers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends and potential cautions in food web research from a bibliometric analysis

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding food webs is important and useful for planning environmental conservation, management and restoration. However, research on food webs is not uniform globally; it tends to be concentrated in specific areas or ecosystem types, and would hinder our understanding of food webs and ecosystem processes. This study examined the trends in food web research over the past decades by analysing publication data from Web of Science; in particular, it focused on the ecosystem types studied, countries in which the studies were done, and which countries collaborated on the studies. A total of 20,239 publications were examined. The results showed that research on food webs has dramatically increased since the 1990s. Most publications related focused on aquatic ecosystems.

show abstract

Bibliometrics and Social Network Analysis of the Nanotechnology Field

Cited by 56 publications

References 6 publications

Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation

Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation

Comparative Analysis of Co-Authorship and Keyword Network for Nanotechnology: Carbon Nanomaterials Field

Trends and potential cautions in food web research from a bibliometric analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About