2000
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased Retellings of Events Yield Biased Memories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
168
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
11
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Talking and thinking repeatedly about an event and relating this event to one's personal life and identity may endow the memory with greater subjective clarity, as has been suggested in the present study by the positive correlations between memory qualities, on the one hand, and measures of rehearsal and identity, on the other. Such rehearsal processes may increase confidence in the memory (Talarico & Rubin, 2003) and, at the same time, lead to the incorporation of incorrect details into the memory representation (Fallshore & Schooler, 1995;Tversky & Marsh, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Talking and thinking repeatedly about an event and relating this event to one's personal life and identity may endow the memory with greater subjective clarity, as has been suggested in the present study by the positive correlations between memory qualities, on the one hand, and measures of rehearsal and identity, on the other. Such rehearsal processes may increase confidence in the memory (Talarico & Rubin, 2003) and, at the same time, lead to the incorporation of incorrect details into the memory representation (Fallshore & Schooler, 1995;Tversky & Marsh, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, by focusing the participants' attention on color and location, we may have altered the factors that typically determine undifferentiated F. Research generally consistent with this possibility has come from studies of spontaneous recognition (Ste-Marie & Jacoby, 1994; see also Jacoby, Ste-Marie, & Toth, 1993) and of source monitoring (e.g., Hashtroudi, Johnson, & Chrosniak, 1990;Hashtroudi, Johnson, Vnek, & Ferguson, 1994), and from those in which the relation between perspective taking and memory has been examined (e.g., Anderson & Pichert, 1978;Tversky & Marsh, 2000). Also consistent with this perspective is recent work showing that the determinants of recognition performance can change, depending on how memory for prior events is queried (Humphreys, Dennis, Maguire, Reynolds, Bolland, & Hughes, 2003).…”
Section: The Effect Of Age On Familiaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Perspective and memory recall. The ABC Model is also informed by research and theory on the influence of people's perspective taking on memory recall (e.g., Baumeister & Newman, 1994;Conway & Pleydell-Pearce, 2000;Pasupathi, 2001;Tversky & Marsh, 2000). Specifically, evidence suggests that the perspective or stance people have when they recall events from memory determines their memory recall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, we discuss how the ABC Model can be used to modify clinical assessment to accommodate discrepancies in the attributions and perspectives that informants have when providing information of the child's behavior and, thus, decrease discrepancies among informants' ratings. negative as well (e.g., perceiving a child as annoying when being asked to rate the child's problematic behavior; Tversky & Marsh, 2000). Because the clinical assessment process almost exclusively relies on the gathering of negative information of the child's behavior to inform treatment, the fact that taking a negatively skewed perspective leads to memory biases for negative events has critical implications for explaining why informant discrepancies in clinical child research exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%