2020
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1793846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased Representation of Politicians in Google and Wikipedia Search? The Joint Effect of Party Identity, Gender Identity and Elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Bing) restricted variation of sources across time, favoring those that were considered “reliable” to prevent the surfacing of “fake news.” Kawakami et al (2020) found that a year before the US elections 2020, the number of unique news in Google’s Top Stories differed for different candidates, and it was higher for Donald Trump, which was attributed to him being the incumbent president. Pradel (2021) found gender and party differences in the amount of personal information related to politicians that appear on the search suggestions before and after the elections. Closer to our work, Metaxa et al (2019) systematically analyzed daily search results, finding search outputs to be relatively stable, though some shifts suggested the existence of internal algorithmic factors, for example, monthly synchronization of Google servers.…”
Section: Search Engine Auditingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…and Bing) restricted variation of sources across time, favoring those that were considered “reliable” to prevent the surfacing of “fake news.” Kawakami et al (2020) found that a year before the US elections 2020, the number of unique news in Google’s Top Stories differed for different candidates, and it was higher for Donald Trump, which was attributed to him being the incumbent president. Pradel (2021) found gender and party differences in the amount of personal information related to politicians that appear on the search suggestions before and after the elections. Closer to our work, Metaxa et al (2019) systematically analyzed daily search results, finding search outputs to be relatively stable, though some shifts suggested the existence of internal algorithmic factors, for example, monthly synchronization of Google servers.…”
Section: Search Engine Auditingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Kalla and Aronow (2015) demonstrate that negative facts are more likely to be removed from such politicians' personal biographies compared to positive facts through experiments with humans. On the other hand, Pradel (2020) suggest that even political affiliation-revealed users place more emphasis on their self-identify as Wikipedia, the eco-system of the platforms mitigates the partisanship of the users. Umarova and Mustafaraj (2019), however, detected the polarization and the tension between users in Wikipedia political page editing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that outputs of web search engines can be systematically skewed towards certain gender and racial groups is increasingly recognized both by the broad public and information retrieval (IR) community [41]. Race and gender biases are found in different IR systems associated with search engines, including text search results [43,38] and search autocompletion [8,13]. However, image search is particularly relevant in this context, because of high interpretative and affective potential of visual information [12,34] that makes it a potent means of challenging, but also forming stereotypes.…”
Section: Related Work: Race and Gender Bias In Image Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%