2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1916883117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased hate crime perceptions can reveal supremacist sympathies

Abstract: People may be sympathetic to violent extremism when it serves their own interests. Such support may manifest itself via biased recognition of hate crimes. Psychological surveys were conducted in the wakes of mass shootings in the United States, New Zealand, and the Netherlands (total n = 2,332), to test whether factors that typically predict endorsement of violent extremism also predict biased hate crime perceptions. Path analyses indicated a consistent pattern of motivated judgment: hate crime perceptions wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While much research on EBEPs has highlighted the role of specific, concrete threats 24 , 66 , the moralized threat hypothesis offers a potential framework for understanding why people may perceive EBEPs as justified, even in the absence of an ostensible material threat. This hypothesis suggests that a person does not necessarily need to fear for their job or safety to engage in or approve of EBEPs; instead, it may be sufficient for them to simply feel a sense of moral outrage 67 . That said, our work tentatively suggests that different domains of moral values may have different risk functions with regard to acts of hate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much research on EBEPs has highlighted the role of specific, concrete threats 24 , 66 , the moralized threat hypothesis offers a potential framework for understanding why people may perceive EBEPs as justified, even in the absence of an ostensible material threat. This hypothesis suggests that a person does not necessarily need to fear for their job or safety to engage in or approve of EBEPs; instead, it may be sufficient for them to simply feel a sense of moral outrage 67 . That said, our work tentatively suggests that different domains of moral values may have different risk functions with regard to acts of hate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings have significant implications for public health and intergroup relations. Tacit support for violence directed at minorities can occur when people perceive less prejudice in perpetrators of “hate crimes.” Feelings of disempowerment can serve as a central mechanism for tacit support [ 42 ]. Importantly, the findings reveal another method of implicit or unspoken support for violence: diminished recognition of emotional trauma and physical pain experienced by the victim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More comparable to our study of Twitter reactions, Besley and Peters (2020) looked at the witness accounts for the event. Additionally, Leander et al (2020) studied the bias observed in the public reaction to violent events, using the Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting and the Christchurch Mosque shooting as examples. The shooter in this event was not given much coverage or analysis in general.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%