2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias correction of high resolution regional climate model data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
147
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
147
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The overestimation of precipitation with probabilities between 0.32 and 0.73 indicates LS method has a very limited ability in reproducing dry day precipitation (below 0.1 mm). Similar to LS method, the LOCI method also overestimates the low precipitation with probabilities between 0.08 and 0.32 and underestimates the high intensities with probabilities below 0.08, which is in line with previous arguments by Berg et al (2012). However, unlike the LS method, the LOCI method performs well on the estimation of the dry days with precipitation below 0.1 mm.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Corrected Precipitation and Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The overestimation of precipitation with probabilities between 0.32 and 0.73 indicates LS method has a very limited ability in reproducing dry day precipitation (below 0.1 mm). Similar to LS method, the LOCI method also overestimates the low precipitation with probabilities between 0.08 and 0.32 and underestimates the high intensities with probabilities below 0.08, which is in line with previous arguments by Berg et al (2012). However, unlike the LS method, the LOCI method performs well on the estimation of the dry days with precipitation below 0.1 mm.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Corrected Precipitation and Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Over the last decade, most of the developed -and therefore applied -bias correction (BC) methods focused on the adjustment of the mean (e.g., Delta method, Xu, 1999), the variance (e.g., simple scaling adjustment, Berg et al, 2012) or more generally on the adjustment of the distribution (e.g., "quantile-mapping", Haddad and Rosenfeld, 1997). Bias adjustments of the whole distribution through quantilemapping techniques have been quite popular since it allows for adjusting not only the mean and variance but also any quantile of the variable of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the simplest form of bias correction for air temperature. The mean bias is added to the model data after calculating the bias for each month of the climatological year (Berg et al, 2012).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%