2023
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2022.3229278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-Level Carbon Trading Model on Demand Side for Integrated Electricity-Gas System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tianrui and Chongqing 19 defines carbon emissions on the demand side based on node carbon emission intensity, and realizes carbon emission reduction by differentiated management on the demand side. In addition, Yan et al 20 validated the feasibility of load aggregator (LA) participating in the carbon trading market, clarified the carbon emission responsibility on the demand side, which can more economically and effectively promote the consumption of low‐carbon energy. However, the above references lack a more comprehensive IES carbon emission flow model, which considers various aspects, such as networks, loads, energy conversion devices, and energy storage devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tianrui and Chongqing 19 defines carbon emissions on the demand side based on node carbon emission intensity, and realizes carbon emission reduction by differentiated management on the demand side. In addition, Yan et al 20 validated the feasibility of load aggregator (LA) participating in the carbon trading market, clarified the carbon emission responsibility on the demand side, which can more economically and effectively promote the consumption of low‐carbon energy. However, the above references lack a more comprehensive IES carbon emission flow model, which considers various aspects, such as networks, loads, energy conversion devices, and energy storage devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huo et al introduce a spatio-temporal flexibility requirement envelope for the low-carbon power system operation with uncertainties [15]. Yan et al consider a bi-level carbon trading scheme to realize the maximization of consumer surplus and incentive the lowcarbon operation [16]. Despite that low-carbon operation has been studied both on generation side and demand side through the carbon emission flow, researchers mainly focus on the specific low-carbon operation model and have developed some methods to address the nonlinearities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Contrary to [4], [14], [16] that dealing with the nonconvexities of the bi-level operation framework through single level reformulation or decomposition, the developed distributed demand management model is reformulated into a networked multiagent constrained Markov Decision Process which only needs partial information exchange, decouples intractable power-carbon flow constraints and adapts to variant states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of carbon capture technology has provided a solution for cleaner coal-fired power generation. Reference [4] has proposed transforming traditional thermal power plants into carbon-capture power plants using post-combustion capture (PCC) technology. Simultaneously, they consider carbon trading mechanisms, which effectively minimize system carbon emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%