2021
DOI: 10.1080/10667857.2021.1886664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-axial flexural strength of resin based dental composites – Influence and reliability of the testing method configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study used the biaxial flexural strength test, which requires less material, and the specimens’ preparation was less sensitive than that of the three-point bending test. For example, disc specimens in the biaxial flexural test can be easily light-cured due to their similar diameter to the light-curing tip [ 49 ]. Furthermore, disc specimens may be less likely to fail due to edge failure compared with a beam specimen in the three-point bending test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study used the biaxial flexural strength test, which requires less material, and the specimens’ preparation was less sensitive than that of the three-point bending test. For example, disc specimens in the biaxial flexural test can be easily light-cured due to their similar diameter to the light-curing tip [ 49 ]. Furthermore, disc specimens may be less likely to fail due to edge failure compared with a beam specimen in the three-point bending test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a limitation of the current study is that the flexural strength testing was biaxial flexural strength testing, while the testing required by BS ISO 4049 is a three-point bending test. Advantages of the biaxial flexural test compared with the three-point bending test include smaller specimens, low technique sensitivity for specimen preparation, and low risk of undesirable failure at the edges of specimens due to flaws (edge failures) [47]. The 2017 guideline for material testing from the Academy of Dental Materials also indicated that the result from the biaxial flexural strength test was correlated with the results from the three-point bending test but with lower variation [48,49].…”
Section: Biaxial Flexural Strength and Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e results of Al-Jaidi et al, Erdem et al, Chen and Shu, Atsu et al, andKumar et al regarding the mode of failure were in line with our findings such that the majority or all failures in the control group were adhesive, whereas most failures were mixed in the sandblasted groups or when MDP-containing bonding agents were used. It seems that sandblasting before the application of bonding agent and use of primer or bonding agents containing MDP result in a strong bond between the zirconia and resin cement and consequently fewer adhesive failures [7,9,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%