2014
DOI: 10.1002/ird.1839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Promises of Technology: A Review of the Discourses and Actors Who Make Drip Irrigation

Abstract: Drip irrigation has long been promoted as a promising way to meet today's world water, food and poverty challenges. In most scientific and policy documents, drip irrigation is framed as a technological innovation with definitive intrinsic characteristics—that of efficiency, productivity and modernity. Based on evidence from North and West Africa as well as South Asia, we show that there are multiple actors involved in shaping this imagery, the legitimacy of which largely stems from an engineering perspective t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This form of drip irrigation appealed to the Burkina Faso government and various development agencies as a technology holding the promises of efficient water and labor management, improved nutrition and food security, poverty alleviation, and women's empowerment (for a description of the rationale to promote micro-drip kits in Sub-Saharan Africa see Venot et al 2014). This enthusiasm underpinned a multiplication of projects centered on the promotion of micro-drip kits, involving numerous development actors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of drip irrigation appealed to the Burkina Faso government and various development agencies as a technology holding the promises of efficient water and labor management, improved nutrition and food security, poverty alleviation, and women's empowerment (for a description of the rationale to promote micro-drip kits in Sub-Saharan Africa see Venot et al 2014). This enthusiasm underpinned a multiplication of projects centered on the promotion of micro-drip kits, involving numerous development actors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, the agricultural sector started several subsidy programmes for water saving irrigation technologies, especially drip irrigation. The amount of water saved as a result of these programmes has rarely been evaluated ), but the programmes were probably essential in providing agriculture with a more positive image of "efficiency, productivity and modernity" (Venot et al 2014). Through the "alignment of farmers' interests and those of the political class" (Allan 2007), solutions are once again being sought in supply management approaches (desalination, inter-basin transfers) or in technological inventions, such as water saving irrigation technologies.…”
Section: Policy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors have warned of the danger of adopting a myopic view that fails to consider the impact of related factors or the required scale of analysis. This is due to the fact that many of the aforementioned works have been developed experimentally at plot level or from a technology-centred perspective, considering drip irrigation implementation as a black-box problem, frequently leaving out many influential factors (López-Gunn et al, 2012b;Venot et al, 2014). Similarly, after a critical and exhaustive literature review, Van der Kooij et al (2013, p.108) stated that "there is no conclusive scientific evidence to support a general belief in drip irrigation as a water saving device or as a tool to help solve the water crisis" and demanded caution against the massive installation of drip irrigation, because national or regional savings cannot be based on results only obtained at plot level.…”
Section: Drip Irrigation: Intended and Unintended Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limited consideration of the sociotechnological change attached to drip irrigation implementation (López-Gunn et al, 2012b;Van der Kooij et al, 2013;Garb & Friedlander, 2014;Venot et al, 2014) has caused unforeseen effects for both users and planners, resulting in successful experiences in some cases and resounding failures in others.…”
Section: Drip Irrigation Paradoxes: the Importance Of Contextual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%