Beyond the Paradox: Religion, Family and Modernity in Contemporary Bangladesh

Abstract

This paper reflects on the apparent 'paradox' of a contemporary Bangladesh that appears both 'more modern' and 'more Islamic', focusing on changes in the family (and the gender and generational orders that it embodies) as a central locus of anxiety and contestation. The paper begins with theory, how the paradox is framed by classical social science expectations of religious decline and how this has been contested by contemporary writers who describe specifically modern forms of piety. It then turns to Bangladesh, where highly publicized symbolic oppositions between 'religion' and 'development' contrast sharply with people's pragmatic accommodation of development goods in everyday life. Analysis of religious references in interview data reveal the co-existence of very different understandings: a more traditional view of religion as embedded in the moral order; and a more modern deliberate cultivation of a religious life. They also reveal how many of the uses which people make of religion are not specifically religious: to conjure a moral universe, to mark what is important to them, to say things about themselves. The final section returns to theory, reflecting on how this is informed by the findings from Bangladesh, and suggesting that the importance of the private and personal as a site for governance offers a further dimension of why the supposed 'paradox' of a religious modernity may not be so paradoxical after all.

The life a person lives: religion, well-being and development in India

“…Second, they are used by people as a way of saying something important about themselves -what matters to them, their sense of powerlessness, their hopes and fears. This is consistent with our findings in previous research in Bangladesh (White 2013). …”

Happiness in Bangladesh: The Role of Religion and Connectedness

“…In more qualitative follow-up research, we identified a number of areas where the influence of religion on wellbeing comes to the fore including the structuring of community relations (Devine and White 2013), responsibilities, obligations and expectations around marriage, gender and intergenerational relations (White 2012), and the development of political culture and democracy (Basu et al 2017). Recently Asadullah and Chaudhury (2012) offer a very different argument.…”

Measuring Multidimensional Aspiration Gaps: A Means to Understanding Cultural Aspects of Poverty

“…In many respects these three items are related and draw attention to the importance of family as a social institution in Bangladesh. Specifically, marriage, having children and bringing them up well constitute core arenas of life fulfilment and are a major focus of personal and cultural anxiety (White, 2009). Becoming shikhito (educated) is therefore an indicator of good standing or upbringing, but it is also strongly perceived as a key source of income growth and social mobility.…”