2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01371.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Elementary Forms of Moral Life: Reflexivity and Rationality in Durkheim's Moral Theory

Abstract: Was Durkheim an apologist for the authoritarianism? Is the sociology founded upon his work incapable of critical perspective; and must it operate under the presumption that social agents, including sociologists themselves, are incapable of reflexivity? Certainly some have said so, but they may be wrong. In this essay, I address these questions in the light of Durkheim's revisionary sociology of morals. I elaborate on unfinished elements in Durkheim's abruptly concluded (because of his early and unexpected deat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. According to Kenny (2010), this conceptual move is compatible with and even implied by Durkheim's perspective on morality. 2.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…1. According to Kenny (2010), this conceptual move is compatible with and even implied by Durkheim's perspective on morality. 2.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In noting changes associated with the modernity of industrializing society, Durkheim explained that simpler, agrarian societies had a more universalized sense of morality, with any two people encountered in a rural area being likely to think similarly in terms of what is good and bad, right and wrong. Alternatively, industrial society tended to break down this unification into smaller "moral spheres" that co-exist in a more complex societal configuration of multiple value systems (Kenny 2010). This multiplicity can evoke recurring meaning crises in terms of how to understand, synthesize, or differentiate between many "meaning constellations" (Seidman 1985).…”
Section: Context: Functionalism and Social Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related Sources: Brashears 2010;Simpson & Willer 2015;Herzog & Price 2016;Simmel 1964;Pescosolido & Rubin 2000;Edgell 2012;Robertson 1977;Snow 2001;Putnam et al 2012;Rahn & Transue 1998;Kenny 2010;Seidman 1985;Smith & Snell 2009. …”
unclassified
“…He was emphatic in his book titled "social fact" that social laws, values, morals, re customs and rituals hold society together and governs the individual's social life and social institutions Stanner, 2017). It is argued that Durkheimian theory view society as coherent entity that is bounded by fundamental social relations (Kenny, 2010). Religiously, Durkheim defined religion as "a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred thing" (Allen, Pickering & Miller, 2012, p.8 Durkheim further clarifies the concept "religion" as the expression of social cohesion which serves several purposes, including providing answers to spiritual mysteries, providing social interaction and socio-emotional support 2014; Wallis, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinning: the Structural Functionalists Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%