Beyond the digital divide: policy analysis for knowledge societies

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report the results of using the framework in the field for the purpose of formulating knowledge policies. The framework derives from a conceptual model for analyzing knowledge development overviewed by the authors in a previous paper.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses the conceptual framework of 13 dimensions for knowledge policy‐making analysis and qualitative focus group discussions by means of what is known as a knowledge SWOT analysis. Such an exercise ordinarily determines what is termed as net strength (strengths offset by weaknesses) and net opportunity (opportunities offset by threats).FindingsThe field research suggests that, whereas quantitative indicators are very commonly used for the purpose of benchmarking and progress tracking, they are limited in terms of determining causes, effects and encapsulating good practices. The present framework provides a means for policy‐makers and analysts to engage in discussion, debates, story‐telling and scenario building in order to understand net strengths and opportunities.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited by the time constraints of the focus group participants and it is not feasible to conduct a K‐SWOT of more than the four societies used for the reason that there are insufficient numbers of informed participants.Practical implicationsDeveloping the knowledge economy has to be more than a management of socio‐economic indicators. Understanding the net strength and opportunity faced by a society in the context of a global knowledge economy allowed insights into gaps that may be addressed with appropriate knowledge policies. There is much work to be done in formulating implementable policy recommendations.Originality/valueIt is hoped that a useful and valid policy analysis tool for knowledge development has thus been described.

Challenges of E-Learing in Nigerian University Education Based on the Experience of Developed Countries

“…Folorunso et al [7] and [14] found that mass unawareness, low computer literacy level and cost were identified as critical factors affecting the acceptability of e-learning by students and lecturers of Nigerian universities. Sharma et al [15] points out that e-learning places high demand on learners who have to be more proactive and disciplined than in traditional face-to-face education. Schulmeister [17] states that experience proved that the benefits of e-learning could not be fully taken advantage of, expectations could not be met and that technology often was used to simply reinforce outmoded approaches to learning.…”

Multidisciplinarity, Citizen Participation and Geographic Information System, Cross-Cutting Strategies for Sustainable Development in Rural Heritage. The Case Study of Valverde de Burguillos (Spain)

“…New technological advances have contributed to the fact that research methodologies based on bibliographic consultation, as well as on maps and cartography, official archives, etc., are evolving towards a more streamlined system based on computer advances and data availability. This progression allows us to delve into the different dimensions of the information, establishing, for example, relationships or patterns that would otherwise be very difficult to identify [13,41,42].…”

A knowledge-based development model for primate cities of the developing world

“…The recognition of cities as an important frontier for addressing human development challenges and their key roles as macro-economic engines has stimulated interest amongst practitioners and theoreticians in the role of knowledgebased development in the urban environment (Borja and Castells, 1997;Bounfour and Edvinsson 2005;Carrillo, 2004Carrillo, , 2015Florida, 2004;Sharma et al, 2008Sharma et al, , 2009. This in turn has given rise to an area of specialization known as knowledge-based urban development or knowledge cities, which is a new hybrid of knowledge-based development and urban studies and which seeks to provide strategic responses for addressing the complex multidisciplinary challenges that cities face (Carrillo, 2004(Carrillo, , 2015.…”