Beyond the Cultural Turn: A Critical Perspective on Culture-Discourse within Public Relations

Abstract

This chapter applies recent theoretical developments linked to the concept of culture to the field of public relations research and practice, notably through the prism of creativity as a vector of cultural change. Design/methodology/approachThe chapter is theoretical in nature, and draws on relevant scientific literature in the field of public relations research, but also the social sciences more generally, and illustrates the issues being discussed with reference to relevant public relations campaigns. FindingsWhile the field of public relations has moved beyond simplistic models of cultural values and characteristics, it is argued that more complex visions of culture have been neglected. Specifically, drawing on structuration theory, culture can be seen as a "system-generating mechanism" relying on creativity to uphold and renew cultural references and norms. In this perspective, public relations is both producing/reproducing culture and being produced by culture. It follows that the concept should be apprehended not as an ontological category, but as a social construct, as the source of heuristic and discursive categorisations. Social implicationsA call is issued for public relations to also question the ideological underpinnings of the production of symbols in which practitioners partake on a daily basis. Originality/valueWhile the chapter fits into an emerging body of work discussing the cultural dimension of public relations, the link with creativity and the use of structuration theory to conceptualise this link contribute to its originality.

The Influence of Self-Efficacy in Ethical Consideration and Decision-Making Processes

“…However, strategic management recognizes practitioner's expertise which is why excellence PR proposes that PR be involved in management decision making. Nevertheless, Hofstedes cultural dimension theory acknowledges power distance, bureaucracy, respect for rank and authority and collectivism in terms of unquestioning loyalty and collective efforts to achieve organization goal (Frame & Ihlen, 2018). Findings from the study depart from excellence theory.…”

Beyond the Language of Covid-19: Transformation of Social Discourse and Reproduction of Cultural Capital

“…Numerous scholars agree that the concept of culture encompasses a set of understandings, system of values, beliefs, norms, knowledge and practices shared by a group to create strategies of action (see, e.g., (Geertz, 1973;Swidler, 1986;Guiso et al, 2006;Patterson, 2010;Frame & Ihlen, 2018;Varnum & Grossmann, 2020). Bauman (1999, p. 28) describes culture as "simultaneously a man-made and a man-making entity" and observes culture as praxis focusing on the tension between its diatomic characteristics of inventing/preserving, novel/traditional, routine/breaking patterns, changes/monotony, unexpected/predictable (Bauman, 1999, p. xiv).…”