2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-012-9195-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the “Charmed Circle” of OECD: New Directions for Studies of National Innovation Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of the NIS to developing countries is also complicated by what they argue are the overly normative tendencies of the NIS concept that confer an innovation system as continually, and often rapidly correcting inefficient pathways toward the advancement and maturing of industries (i.e., there are good and bad NISs), and that the emphasis is on technology based manufacturing (e.g., automobiles and computer electronics) and high tech industries (e.g., ICT and biotech). In doing so, the application of the NIS concept to developing countries may very well miss existing innovation systems in these countries that are based on more slowly developing, less technology driven industries (e.g., agriculture and craft industries) -possibly hindering the application of the NIS concept as a development tool and strategy (see Delvenne and Thoreau, 2012).…”
Section: Moving Beyond the Oecd: Different Institutional Incentives Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the NIS to developing countries is also complicated by what they argue are the overly normative tendencies of the NIS concept that confer an innovation system as continually, and often rapidly correcting inefficient pathways toward the advancement and maturing of industries (i.e., there are good and bad NISs), and that the emphasis is on technology based manufacturing (e.g., automobiles and computer electronics) and high tech industries (e.g., ICT and biotech). In doing so, the application of the NIS concept to developing countries may very well miss existing innovation systems in these countries that are based on more slowly developing, less technology driven industries (e.g., agriculture and craft industries) -possibly hindering the application of the NIS concept as a development tool and strategy (see Delvenne and Thoreau, 2012).…”
Section: Moving Beyond the Oecd: Different Institutional Incentives Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chapter builds heavily on a previous version of our work, published in Delvenne and Thoreau (2012). We wish to thank the reviewers of this version who forced us to further some of our arguments and to alleviate a couple of blind spots from other disciplinary perspectives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This section examines the trajectory of Latin American STI regimes (Delvenne and Thoreau 2012). There are the global and regional contexts, for instance the emergence of the US hegemonic power and the rise of the Third World's (geo)political claims, the impacts of the broad debates of dependency theory, the aftermath of the 1959 Cuban revolution and the rise of a Latin American movement for science, technology and development in the 1960s.…”
Section: Breaking the Oecd 'Charmed Circle' In Latin Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because it introduces and implements a descriptive and simplified conceptualization of innovation, which tends to ignore socio-political landscapes and the global context, and is reductionist in its focus on economic growth (Delvenne and Thoreau 2012). Nevertheless, some authors have argued that the NIS framework is useful in a developing country context, although it needs to (a) more explicitly integrate activities and functions beyond adaptation and adoption; (b) focus on the process of learning and the development of capabilities through which knowledge can be developed for the local context (Kraemer-Mbula and Wamae 2010; Wamae 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%