“…The focus on forms of violence that can be attributed to individual and collectively identifiable perpetrators-the homophobic bullying, the racist slur or even the queer gentrifier--can also distract from those forms that appear in impersonal garb, through the force of rising rents, real estate investment and speculation, regulatory licensing and the governance of 'security'. If the latter are addressed through forms of collective action, as for example through the tenants' initiative Kotti & Co. that in 2012 erected a protest camp in Kreuzberg and has mobilized against rising rents and expulsions, urban residents can (re-)discover 18 The term subculture, developed separately in the context of the Chicago School of Sociology and in the context of the Birmingham-based Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS), has come under profound criticism within and beyond the disciplines of Cultural Studies and Sociology (Bennett, 1999;Blackman, 2005;Huq, 2005;Muggleton, 2005) for its alleged reification of cultural processes and its inability to capture the complexity of cultural agency. I nevertheless find it useful here for the purposes of this article, because the activists described here use the term and see their cultural production in a political sense as both subordinate and counterhegemonic in relation to a wider, dominant cultural formation perceived as heteronormative and racist, holding on to the Gramscian insights associated with the concept in the work of the CCCS (Clarke et al, 1993(Clarke et al, [1976 that the fault lines thought to provoke conflict among apparently antagonistic cultural groups give way to new acts of citizenship and right to the city alliances based on shared interests.…”