2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond pure offsetting: Assessing options to generate Net-Mitigation-Effects in carbon market mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schneider (2009b) suggests that setting baselines below BAU emissions can lead to an atmospheric benefit as offsets projects are credited with fewer offsets than their true emissions reductions. Bento et al (2015), Erickson et al (2014) and Warnecke et al (2014) model under-and over-crediting of offsets projects and find that under-crediting can play a significant role in maintaining environmental integrity of climate change mitigation programs. In both cases, aggregate emissions can increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schneider (2009b) suggests that setting baselines below BAU emissions can lead to an atmospheric benefit as offsets projects are credited with fewer offsets than their true emissions reductions. Bento et al (2015), Erickson et al (2014) and Warnecke et al (2014) model under-and over-crediting of offsets projects and find that under-crediting can play a significant role in maintaining environmental integrity of climate change mitigation programs. In both cases, aggregate emissions can increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…related to economic conditions, policy implementation, technology availability, etc. ; see for instance (Ellis and Bosi, 2000[3]; Willems, 2001[4]; Violette, Mudd and Keneipp, 2001 [5]; Salon, 2001[6]; Ellis, 2001 [7]; Bosi, 2001[8]; Kartha, Lazarus and Bosi, 2002 [9]; Bosi and Laurence, 2002 [10]; Prag and Briner, 2012 [11]; Clapp and Prag, 2012 [12]). The baseline sets the reference level of GHG emissions against which the amount of credits that can be issued is calculated.…”
Section: Box 1 Crediting Mechanisms' Baselines and The Principle Of Conservativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological approaches for setting emissions baselines have been discussed extensively in the literature, especially in the context of the KP mechanisms, e.g. including in previous CCXG 5 papers, see (Ellis and Bosi, 2000[3]; Willems, 2001[4]; Violette, Mudd and Keneipp, 2001[5]; Salon, 2001[6]; Ellis, 2001[7];…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research areas include leakage effects (Calvin et al, 2015;Geres & Michaelowa, 2002;Kallbekken, 2007;Schneider, Lazarus, & Kollmuss, 2010;Sonter, Barrett, Moran, & Soares-Filho, 2015;Vöhringer, Kuosmanen, & Dellink, 2006), monitoring of emission reductions (Shishlov & Bellassen, 2016;Warnecke, 2014), and how the CDM could provide global net emissions reductions (Chung, 2007;Erickson et al, 2014;Kollmuss & Lazarus, 2011;Schneider, 2009a;Vrolijk & Phillips, 2013;Warnecke, Wartmann, Höhne, & Blok, 2014). Less literature is available on the environmental integrity of Joint Implementation under Article 6 of the Protocol (Kollmuss et al, 2015;Michaelowa, 1998; and International Emissions Trading under Article 17 of the Protocol (Aldrich & Koerner, 2012;Tuerk et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, France introduced a general 10% discount on domestic JI projects, implying that only 90% of the emission reductions be issued as ERUs. Existing research has focused on discount rates in the context of offset mechanisms (Bakker, Haug, Van Asselt, Gupta, & Saïdi, 2011;Chung, 2007;Erickson et al, 2014;Schneider, 2009a;Warnecke et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%