Beyond one work day? A daily diary study on causal and reverse effects between experienced workplace incivility and behaving rude towards others

Vahle-Hinz, Tim; Baethge, Anja; Dick, Rolf van

doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1576633

Cited by 31 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The third hypothesis of the present study proposed that WPI intervenes in the negative association of DT and OCB. Findings of this study proved H3, which explains that dark personality holder individuals behave uncivil at the workplace with their supervisors, peers, and subordinates when they feel the threat to their ego from the environment of the organization, that resultantly reduce positive outcomes i.e., OCB (Abrar et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2019;Schilpzand et al, 2016;Taylor et al, 2012;Vahle-Hinz, Baethge, & Van Dick, 2019). Furthermore, by using the lens of ECT (Victor & Cullen, 1987, 1988, the fourth hypothesis of this study proposes that the ethical climate of the organization diminishes the intensity of negative personality and their uncivil behaviors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

A Moderated Mediation Model: Mediating Mechanism of Workplace Incivility and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics between Dark Triad and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

2020

MIHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

A Moderated Mediation Model: Mediating Mechanism of Workplace Incivility and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics between Dark Triad and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

2020

MIHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Further, evidence showed that only four studies (three of them in United States and one in UK) utilized experiment design (4.3%). Interestingly, only more recently diary surveys started to be used by researchers (Nicholson and Griffin, 2017;Vahle-Hinz et al, 2019). The two studies under such a denomination were conducted in Australia and German.…”

Section: Collection Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workplace incivility: a literature review

Vasconcelos¹

2020

IJWHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThere have been strides in workplace incivility (WI), but in what direction, angles and theoretical streams are they taking place? In light of it, the purpose of this review is to analyze the overall WI research output yielded in the initial decades of this century.Design/methodology/approachThis investigation searched exclusively for empirical articles written in English that matched the terms incivility and WI in the websites of prominent peer-review publications covering the period of 19 years (i.e. 2000–2019). As a result, 93 peer-reviewed empirical studies were properly gathered and classified.FindingsWI is one of the most relevant topics in OB studies under scrutiny in this moment. Corroborating such a perception is the huge amount of outlets that have been publishing about WI. In this sense, it is a topic that has gained strong interdisciplinary status, given the manifested interest of very distinct areas. Cross-sectional studies have prevailed in terms of method preferences, yet other approaches have been used. Of noteworthy is the shortage of qualitative and meta-analytic studies. Data provided evidence that a very limited number of nations (only 18 countries) have been investigated and it is not exactly surprising that the United States be the target of the majority of studies in this field. The antecedents and consequences of WI are the major focus of the investigations. But I found some evidence that that WI has been tested as performing the role of measure, mediator and moderator.Research limitations/implicationsIt focused exclusively on peer-review journals and articles written in English.Originality/valueThis endeavor contributes to the theory of WI by encompassing crucial aspects such as time horizon, major outlets, study types, country-level output, samples features, constructs perused, theoretical function of WI and research outcomes. In addition, it points out new potential research streams.

show abstract

“…Accordingly, the social interactionist model (Andersson and Pearson, 1999) suggests that targets might respond to experienced interpersonal conflict by enacting negative interpersonal behaviors themselves. Yet, moving beyond the assumption of direct reciprocity, the social interactionist model suggests that, in an attempt to establish justice or to defend their self-worth, targets might pay back negative acts of others not only by behaving negatively toward the offender but also by redirecting their negative reaction toward others (i.e., displaced retaliation; e.g., Rosen et al, 2016;Vahle-Hinz et al, 2019). Indeed, experiencing negative treatment, conflicts, or interactional injustice (Ambrose et al, 2002) elicits global negative interpersonal responses including low general willingness to help coworkers (e.g., Chiaburu and Harrison, 2008) or to exchange knowledge (Chen, 2011), and high overall, generalized knowledge hiding (Jahanzeb et al, 2019;Khalid et al, 2018).…”

Section: Interpersonal Conflict With Coworkers As An Antecedent Of Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Be smart, play dumb? A transactional perspective on day-specific knowledge hiding, interpersonal conflict, and psychological strain

Venz

Shoshan

2021

Human Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on knowledge hiding, the intentional attempt to withhold knowledge that others have requested, strikingly shows its detrimental consequences. But, if it has only negative effects, why do employees hide knowledge in their everyday work at all? With this diary study, we address this question, shedding light on the instrumentality of knowledge hiding. Specifically, placing it within the transactional stress model, we argue that deceptive knowledge hiding (playing dumb and evasive hiding) may function as coping, relating negatively to psychological strain responses to experienced interpersonal conflict. Accordingly, we tested evasive hiding and playing dumb as mediators of the day-specific relationship between conflict and end-of-work exhaustion and negative affect. Based on data of 101 employees who reported on 615 workdays, results of multilevel path analyses showed relationship conflict positively related to evasive hiding and playing dumb. Playing dumb was negatively related to end-of-work psychological strain responses, resulting in inconsistent mediation. Evasive hiding was unrelated to psychological strain. Showing the potential intrapersonal benefits of playing dumb, this paper helps to better understand the occurrence of enacted ‘negative’ interpersonal work behaviors, yielding important implications for research and practice.

show abstract

Beyond one work day? A daily diary study on causal and reverse effects between experienced workplace incivility and behaving rude towards others

Abstract: Van Dick (2019) Beyond one work day? A daily diary study on causal and reverse effects between experienced workplace incivility and behaving rude towards others,

Cited by 31 publications

References 59 publications

A Moderated Mediation Model: Mediating Mechanism of Workplace Incivility and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics between Dark Triad and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

A Moderated Mediation Model: Mediating Mechanism of Workplace Incivility and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics between Dark Triad and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Workplace incivility: a literature review

Be smart, play dumb? A transactional perspective on day-specific knowledge hiding, interpersonal conflict, and psychological strain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About